On Apr 14, 9:26 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:b2f03fee-8b4b-49fb-84a6-8fad6c6685f1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Apr 12, 11:30 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>news:f53a863b-93ad-49ee-89cf-2221e986ef2a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On Apr 10, 11:15 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>
>>news:7a5af51d-2e5b-4824-b2f2-0c5c7f9463de@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> >> > On Apr 10, 1:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >> I suspect he even married one [a tramp] (although she
> >> >> >> is a Saint for putting up with him).
> >> >> >> [...]
>
> >> >> > You know nothing of my wife and would dare say that you would
not
> >> >> > have
> >> >> > the testicular fortitude to repeat that to me one on one face to
> >> >> > face ... cyber-coward.
>
> >> >> Hells Bells, I KNOW she is crazy as a loon for being married to
you.
> >> >> Ask
> >> >> her
> >> >> what she ever saw in you sometime why don't you? But she is going
to
> >> >> divorce
> >> >> you once she discovers what you have been doing on Usenet. Women
don't
> >> >> like
> >> >> hysterical men. A sign of weakness, you know.
> >> >> [...]
>
> >> > First off, my wife knows very well what I am doing on Usenet.
That's
> >> > no secret. The only issue she has is regarding the exorbitant
amount
> >> > of timethat I have wasted on a worthless, sicko, cretin like you
and
> >> > there is no debating the issue. She is spot on. No woman, privy
to
> >> > your Usenet activities would ever consider the prospect of marrying
a
> >> > loon like you, but there never was any imminent danger of that ever
> >> > happening now is there?
>
> >> Jeez, I just want to know if she would post a message to Usenet about
> >> peeing
> >> like Marian Rosenberg the Jewess did.
>
> > Fair enough. Your answer in short is no, but the longer explanation
> > is that, in an of itself, that neither makes my wife a saint nor
> > Marian a sinner. It just indicates that they are different ...
> > nothing more ... nothing less.
>
> I do not go for this "different" stuff when it comes to morality. I
expect a
> Jewess to be just as good as I would want my wife to be. I guess you and
I
> "differ" in that.
You are making an assumption (conclusion that does not follow). I set
standards in choosing a wife. Who doesn't? I don't happen to
consider what Marian wrote to be vulgar or immoral and her ethnicity
has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. You seem to have many
hangups one of them being the "Jewish issue", another being women in
general and Marina just happens to be both.
> >> Why cannot you ask her and get an
> >> answer from her and re****t it to the honorable gentlemen of these
cycling
> >> newsgroups?
>
> > For one thing, no one cares and for another ... AND YOU SEEM NOT TO
> > GET THIS ... my wife wants no part of your nonsense, but you have your
> > answer and that's all you'll get.
>
> Marian the Jewess can say any crappy thing she wants on Usenet, but not
your
> wife? That much I got!
Like you, Marian can say anything she wants just as you say anything
you want. This is an unmoderated forum ... remember? What you
DIDN'T GET is that like you, I can approve or disapprove of what
someone has to say. You disapproved of what Marian said and I
didn't. What you also DIDN"T GET is that I am not my wife' personal
censor and she really doesn't require one either. Furthermore, there
is no need to even be concerned about what my wife says on Usenet.
since she has never made a Usenet post. What don't you understand
about all this, since I have repeated this many times now, in the
hopes that it would finally sink in? Gee, you are thick headed.
> > I've been correcting your formatting, but without complaint, but have
> > tired of doing so. Consequently,left the rest as is (see immediately
> > below). You would... should have been preceded by two ">" and there
> > should not have been a blank line preceded by a single ">" immediately
> > following! You complain about others?
>
> When I break into a paragraph that is the way it formats. Get used to it
> because I am not going to waste any time cleaning up anything on Usenet.
> Everything else that is wrong with the formatting is due to the Google
> website that you are using. Get a newsreader why don't you - or does not
> your ISP sup****t one?
All ISPs su****t a newsreader. I clean up as I go when I break into a
paragraph. Your laziness is discourteous to the reader****p.
>
>
>
> >> You would first have to like women ... and,
>
> >> > then you would have to be attracted to one ... and, then she would
> >> > have to be attracted to you. Nope ... never happen!
>
> >> I believe woman are not even of the same species that we are.
>
> > No one is the same species that you are, if that's what you mean.
>
> >> Therefore it is worse than bestiality to even consider marrying one.
>
> > That attitude explains much about you. Need I go on?
>
> >> According to Marian
> >> Rosenberg the Jewess they do not even pee the same way we do!
>
> > Why sure they do. Their anatomical conduit is just shorter although
> > Marian's might be longer than yours.
>
> >> What did you not
>
> >> > understand when I told you that wife wanted to hear no more of your
> >> > crap. Gee you're dense. We have been happy together for 32 years.
> >> > It took my wife, a soon to be license to practice therapist, only a
> >> > brief exposure to you to arrive at the conclusion that she wanted
to
> >> > hear nothing more from you or even about you.. You do the math on
the
> >> > contrasting time frames and draw you own conclusion. Need some
help
> >> > crunching the numbers? Divorce prognostication ... I suspect she
had
> >> > 32 year to make that decision and it hasn't happened yet. That
> >> > reminds me ... have you and M.V. set the date yet?
>
> >> I am still waiting to hear what your wife has to say about posting
> >> messages
> >> about peeing on the Internet?
>
> > She asked not to be troubled with your crap and I intent to abide by
> > her wishes, so I guess you will have to just go on wondering I
> > suppose. Have you nothing better to do?
>
> Just keep telling us how wonderful you think Marian the Jewess is
posting
> crap about peeing and I will keep on asking you if your wife approves of
> such female shenanigans.
You are forever trying to put words in my mouth. I never claimed
Marina was wonderful. I don't even know the woman. I merely went on
record to indicate that you over-reacted and, unlike you, I was not
offended. You can keep asking away, but you'll get no response other
than what you already have. Harp on Ed.
>> Perhaps she is a Jewess like Marian and thinks
> >> talking about peeing on the Internet is OK?
>
> > A Jewess ... well no. What my wife's opinion shouldn't matter.. I
> > thought you were concerned about Marians and my opinion. Just don't
> > know what your hangup is about my wife's opinion, but that is your
> > problem to sort out. You don't know her, so you her opinion should be
> > of no concern of yours.
>
> I can't understand why you think it is OK for Marian the Jewess to post
> messages about peeing but it would not be OK for your non-Jewish wife to
do
> so. Please explain?
I can't understand why you assume that you know what I think and I
can't understand why you keep trying to put words in my mouth. I have
addressed this matter multiple times now. If you are too dense to
comprehend, that'syour problem to resolve not mine.
> >> >> >> The next time you go cycling with your best buddy Ed Gin (the
> >> >> >> criminal
> >> >> >> vandal troll who destroyed ARBR), ask him what he has against
folks
> >> >> >> named
> >> >> >> Fred?
>
> >> >> > If he is not my buddy, how then could he be my best one? I may
not
> >> >> > encounter him again for a couple of years, but have no intention
of
> >> >> > asking him anything for you. Ask him yourself. Who the hell is
> >> >> > Fred?
>
> >> >> Fred was the fictional character created by your best buddy Ed Gin
> >> >> (the
> >> >> criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR) to tweak all the slow
> >> >> re***bent
> >> >> riders of ARBR.
>
> >> > Perpetual regurgitated falsehood by Ed Dolan (the criminal vandal
> >> > troll who has come the closest to destroying ARBR).
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> ****ing Regards,
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> >> >> >> >> >> aka
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual
Sorrows -
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Minnesota
|
