Re: OFF TOPIC FUN - The SPAMMER, Rear-ended

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ee011a63-24cd-4982-b62c-3fe1b71f1284@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 25, 9:57 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[...]
>> The above two miscreants were never responsive to anyone or anything.
Ed
>> Dolan the Great is the opposite of those two assholes. He stands behind

>> his
>> every message and is more than willing to take on all comers, even
though
>> they be idiots!
>
> If I could pick just one message that I would challenge the
> prevaricating Mr. Dolan to stand behind it would be this one ... "I
> will never post to Usenet again or any other cycling forum for that
> matter as I do not really have much interest in the subject nor do I
> wish anymore to converse with my inferiors."  Predictably, he will
> attempt to lie his way out of this one ... one lie to cover another,
> but remember that Mr. Dolan also once wrote ... "My every message to
> these confounded newsgroups is a masterpiece of insignificance and
> irrelevance."  That pretty much sums things up.  His messages are as
> insignificnat and irrelevant as the author who crafts them.

It is impossible to communicate anything to a blockhead. Ever hear of 
tongue-in-cheek? How about hyperbole? Or satire or self mockery? JM is a 
sensitive soul who cannot take any criticism. His delicate ego always gets

in the way.

>> > Ed wears two hats ... that of a troll and that of a spammer and
>> > nothing he can offer in his defense will repudiate this accusation.
>> > Ed's voluminous posts stand in condemnation for what and who he is.
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great is as innocent and pure as the driven snow. But if
JM
>> wants to talk about someone nefarious on Usenet, he should look inward 
>> and
>> tell the rest of us what it is like to be a stalker. Ed Dolan the Great

>> has
>> too much pride to ever stalk anyone, but apparently not JM.
>
> Quit your whining, already.  You have only yourself to blame for
> "stalking".  You deliberately troll for adversaries in quest for a
> cyber-skirmish.  When you encounter a tenacious, formidable adversary,
> and find yourself hopelessly embroiled in an embarrassing no-win cyber-
> skirmish, in desperation, you move to disen***ber yourself by seeking
> to discredit and dismiss your adversary by labeling him or her as a
> stalker.

And just who would this tenacious, formidable adversary be pray tell?
Surely 
you don't mean yourself! I regard you as nothing more nor less than an 
earnest fool, a foil for what I want to say to one and all. But the fact 
remains that you are indeed a stalker. I am an equal op****tunity offender 
and have no particular interest in any single individual.

This thinly disguised ploy of yours has failed countless
> times.  If you really want to escape your self-inflicted dilemma, then
> turn tail and slither on out of here.

I am getting exactly what I want from these cycling newsgroups. Even you
are 
nothing but grist for my mill.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

PS. I would be cautious about aligning yourself with LM. She is a ****
from 
way back and has a notoriously bad reputation on these newsgroups.