Re: OFF TOPIC FUN - The TROLL, Rear-ended

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:b0f78f62-1157-4ead-bef3-b3cc15bc151b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 25, 4:07 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:b4511f87-eb7e-40a6-ba88-f6e6b67e3f0a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Mar 25, 10:08 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> Nope! You raised the issue of his character which I answered. You 
>> >> trust
>> >> him,
>> >> I don't!
>>
>> > I refer you to what I already wrote above.  You have failed once
again
>> > to address the comments I made.  I did not specifically comment about
>> > the Wayne's character.  I don't know him personally and have no basis
>> > upon which to even have an informed opinion in that regard, but I did
>> > make a logical assumption to counter your less than logical
assumption
>> > and assertion that  a visit to Wayne's website would result in the
>> > contraction of a virus.  The burden of proof rest squarely on the
>> > shoulders of the accuser ... so prove it.  Been there done than ...
no
>> > parasitic code.  The only parasite is you.
>>
>> You trust him enough to go to his website. I don't. I base my distrust
of
>> him on his poetry of piss, **** and **** which goes directly to the 
>> question
>> of his character.
>
> Not trusting the man is not reason enough  for you to caution others
> not to pay the man's website for fear that they will contract a virus
> unless you can prove what you say is true and you have failed to do
> that.  As Tom Sherman would say ... Where's your proof?  FACT: No one
> has contracted a virus from visiting Wayne's website as you surmised
> they would and even were so bold as to emphatically proclaimed they
> would.  Then again, you proclaim lots of crap only to be proven wrong
> time and time again.  So much for your integrity, reliability and
> trustworthiness.  You have nothing but prose upon which to base your
> inane assumption?  And from this rather shaky foundation, make a
> quantum leap of logic to arrive and a less that reasonable
> conclusion?  Do you even have a single brain cell still firing?  I
> cant imagine that a moron like you would ever or should ever be picked
> to serve on a jury the way you reason or don't as the case may be.
> You are one sorry old bastard.  That much is obvious.

Everyone can make up their own minds about the safety of going to a 
s***bag's website. Frankly, I think it is better to be safe than sorry.
[...]

>> I am here 24 hours a day for Wayne Leggett. It is interesting to engage

>> him
>> as he is some sort of idiot savant. He only comes to life when he
writes
>> verse. Too bad he does not have brains enough to stay off the subjects
of
>> piss, **** and ****. He needs to write about love and death. What other
>> subjects are there for a poet!
>
> Too bad you don't have the brains, or even the common sense, to stay
> off subjects with which you have little or no expertise.

The Great Ed Dolan fears no subject. How could he since he knows something

about everything. He is a true dilettante and Renaissance man.

>> Why must you always contradict yourself?  The conundrum
>> continues.
>>
>> I am only into saying what I want to say, not what you want me to say. 
>> There
>> is no conundrum once you realize that.
>
> Your consistent contradiction of yourself is a conundrum.  Your
> inability to recognize that as a conundrum is itself a conundrum.

A conundrum is a conundrum is a conundrum. A conundrum by any other name
is 
not a conundrum.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota