Re: Jim McNamara and Ed Gin - together again!

Edward Dolan wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:ftjm4k$k7d$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> JimmyMac aka Jim McNamara wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> We just ventured in the the realm of beastiality and necrophilia here
>>> and I suspect Ed's fallacious extension of the definition of a
>>> homo***ual would be objected to by a homo***ual who by definition is
>>> attracted to live members of his or her own gender.  I thought even Ed
>>> knew this.  He really ought to get out more.[...]
>> Is that really a good idea? Think of the innocent!
> 
> Homos are NOT born that way. They CHOOSE to be homo. It is on that basis

> that they can so easily be condemned for the wretched bastards that they

> are. Did you know that Iran has no homos, according to their president?
That 
> is because they have the good sense to execute them wherever they are
found.
> 
Do I have to explain the joke?

> We all must ask ourselves what the Spanish Inquisition would do about it
and 
> then go and do likewise.
> 
The Spanish Inquisition would poke them with soft cu****ons with the 
stuffing up one end, then make them sit in The Comfy Chair till lunch 
time, with only a cup of coffee at eleven, while shouting "Confess! 
Confess! Confess!".

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful