On Apr 10, 1:28 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:117f98b1-bd4a-43bb-a3e2-38bc833d53bd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Apr 8, 10:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>news:fthbot$sof$3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > Marian Rosenberg wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 8, 1:08 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <mik...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> >>> | I wear bib knickers in all weather, because I prefer
> >> >>> | to keep the sun off the tops of my thighs. Bibs because
> >> >>> | there they do not depend on a waist band to keep them
> >> >>> | in place.
>
> >> >>> Bib shorts are highly addictive. I can't imagine ever wearing
> >> >>> anything
> >> >>> else
> >> >>> now. What I like is that you can sit, stand, move around as much
as
> >> >>> you
> >> >>> want
> >> >>> and the shorts stay in place.
>
> >> >> Yabbut PEEING is really hard.
>
> >> >> I mean, if you are a pro rider of the male persuasion and have
> >> >> practice you might be able to stand up on the pedals pull the
shorts
> >> >> up up up and pull it out and take a whiz while one of your
teammates
> >> >> holds on to your saddle to keep you moving but if you AREN'T a pro
> >> >> rider, don't have teammates, or happen to be a girl (like me)
peeing
> >> >> becomes really difficult.
>
> >> >> Which is not to say that my two pairs of bib shorts aren't among
my
> >> >> favorites just that I really wish there was an easier way to go to
the
> >> >> toilet that didn't involve getting completely undressed when
wearing
> >> >> them.
>
> >> > A fully-faired re***bent with a "discharge tube" has its
advantages. :)
>
> >> It is highly inappropriate for a female to be discussing discharges
of
> >> any
> >> kind before a cycling newsgroup made up mostly of honorable
gentlemen.
>
> > Dolan continues to manifest his misogynistic tendencies especially
> > those related to perfectly normal biological components and function.
> > Now I wonder why that is?
>
> "Perfectly normal biological components and function" have their place -
and
> it is not on a newsgroup which contains a Great Saint like Saint Edward
the
> Great. Marian needs to find a sewing circle where she can discuss her
> components and functions with those similarly equipped.
> [...]
>
> >> I urge Marian Rosenberg to give up her vulgarity and to emulate the
ways
> >> of
> >> Saint Edward the Great. Just because she is a Jewess does not mean
she
> >> needs
> >> to talk and act like a pig.
>
> > So then, Marian should get a *** change, become celibate hate all
> > women except the blessed lady? Understandably, Marian will wisely
> > ignore Dolan's inane advice. He really needs to take these issues up
> > with his therapist rather than the ARBR reader****p.
>
> Marian needs to stop talking about peeing on a public forum.
Say who, the sel-appointed moderator and censor. I piss on your
sentiment.
> Only a degenerate
Unsubstantiated (non uncommon) gratuitous allegation ... the best th
doddering old dolt can muster.
> like JimmyMac who is a stalker given to ***ual innuendo
And more of the same plus a classic ego defense mechanism (projection)
is on display here. Ed Dolan is so transparent.
> and a close and dear friend of Ed Gin
And still more of the same ... worthy of note only if the miscreant
had any degree of credibility.
> he criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR
Then how is it that you are still able to post here? The conundrum
continues.
> would somehow think that is OK.
Yepper. I was not offended by what Marian wrote. The though of
anything associated with that part of the female anatomy is repugnant
and disgusting to Dolan, now do you suppose that would be?
One of your favorite abuse of this particular logical fallacy
continues to be demonstrated post after post. Argumentum ad nauseam
(argument to the point of disgust; i.e., by repetition). This is the
fallacy of trying to prove something by saying it again and again. But
no matter how many times you repeat something, it will not become any
more true than it was in the first place. What is fallacious is to
expect the repetition alone to substitute for real arguments.
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
