"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e3727bfb-85a0-4a30-85aa-278427d41a49@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 12, 10:49 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:585e17cc-0a68-4ea0-8e8a-1f032f874512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 11, 8:40 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
>>news:482643bd-e2d4-4be8-8d54-37c0c91c9844@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> > On Apr 10, 11:41 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> >> It is vulgar in the extreme for a female to talk about peeing in
>> >> >> public.
>>
>> >> > As vulgar as you are, why bother to vainly attempt to feign that
>> >> > your
>> >> > delicate sensibilities were offended? Thanks I needed a laugh.
>>
>> >> >> Only tramps and whores do things like that. Ask your wife if she
>> >> >> would
>> >> >> talk
>> >> >> about peeing on Usenet? Go on - ask her! I will know what to
think
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> her
>> >> >> depending on her answer.
>>
>> >> > I have been informed by my wife that she has heard enough and
wants
>> >> > to
>> >> > hear nothing more of you and could care less what you think of her
>> >> > so. You got that?
>>
>> >> You think it is OK for Marian Roesenberg the Jewess to be vulgar on
>> >> the
>> >> Internet but not your wife?
>>
>> > Does the particular sentence make any sense to anyone? My wife is
>> > neither vulgar nor does she post to this or any other newsgroup. Ed
>> > do yourself and everyone esle a favor and seek professional help.
You
>> > are badly in need.
>>
>> So you think it is OK for Marian Rosenberg the Jewess to be vulgar but
>> not
>> your own wife. Why is that? Please explain yourself. If it is OK for
>> Marian
>> to talk about peeing on the Internet, why is it not OK for your wife to
>> talk
>> about peeing on the Inernet?
>
> Trying to put words in my mouth are you? Where pray tell did I voice
> an opinion about what my wife does or does not post on the internet,
> either pro or con? I haven't, but as usual, you have again issued
> unfounded accusations with no corroboration whatsoever. This is a
> polite way of calling you what you in fact are... a LIAR! I said
> several things all of which have apparently escaped your poor powers
> of perception. My wife does not post to Usenet forums (her choice)
> and she is not part an parcel of this discussion anymore and never
> should have been. Furthermore, I have already voiced my opinion about
> what Marian Rosengberg's post and will not be drawn into emulating you
> with cyclical redundancy. Do you have a reading or a retention
> problem. Go back and read what I wrote.
"So you think it is OK for Marian Rosenberg the Jewess to be vulgar but
not
your own wife. Why is that? Please explain yourself. If it is OK for
Marian
to talk about peeing on the Internet, why is it not OK for your wife to
talk
about peeing on the Inernet?" - Ed Dolan
>>
>> Frankly, I would not mind peeing on the Internet myself if I thought I
>> could
>> short it out by so doing.
>
> Frankly I wouldn't mind pissing on your grave, so be accommodating and
> make it soon.
Beware of wi****ng anyone dead before their time. All that does is summon
the
Grim Reaper - for you!
>> >> Everyone already knows what the Great Ed Dolan
>> >> thinks of you, but your wife is still an open question, although of
>> >> course
>> >> she was crazy to marry you. I expect she will divorce you any day
now
>> >> once
>> >> she learns what you have been up to on Usenet. Most sane woman do
not
>> >> have
>> >> any sympathy for pathetic stalkers who are given to ***ual innuendo
>> >> and
>> >> who
>> >> befriend criminals like Ed Gin.
>>
>> >> Regards,
>>
>> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> >> aka
>> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
|
