Talk About Network

Google





Cycling > Recumbent > Re: IRD Freewhe...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 4001 of 4235
Post > Topic >>

Re: IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??

by Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 19, 2008 at 06:26 PM

Chalo Colina wrote:
> Tom Sherman wrote:
>> ChaloColina wrote:
>>> Adam Kadlubek wrote:
>>>> Sugino XD 152mm length, 110 BCD with custom rings (61 TASpecialities,
>>>> 46 ****mano and 34 Stronglight). Long bolts to keep it all together.
>>> Perhaps you'd be better able to "gear down" with your legs (instead of
>>> an umpteen-speed cluster) if you used adult-sized cranks.
>> And perhaps Adam would hurt his knees if he used "adult-sized cranks".
>> Do not assume that just because longer cranks and a lower cadence works
>> well on an upright, the same is true for a re***bent - the evidence so
>> far indicates the opposite.
> 
> That sounds like another shortcoming of tried-and-rejected bike
> layout.
> 
Pun intended?

Why would shorter cranks (for a given rider) being ideal on a re***bent 
compared to an upright be a shortcoming?

> For what it's worth, I use 127mm cranks on my fixed-gear 'bent.
> That's to make up for the naturally short gearing:
> 
> http://chalo.org
> 
I liked the picture of the big wheel with the fluffy kitty in the seat 
better.

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
Chalo <chalo.colina@[E  2008-04-19 09:20:03 
Re: IRD Freewheels : Worth 3x the cost ??
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-04-19 18:26:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 1:23:30 PST 2009.