Talk About Network

Google





Cycling > Recumbent > Re: Chain idler...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 13 Topic 4020 of 4235
Post > Topic >>

Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed

by Jon Bendtsen <noone@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 28, 2008 at 01:38 PM

Adam Kadlubek wrote:
> On 28 Kwi, 00:37, Jon Bendtsen <no...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Tom Sherman wrote:
>>> Jon Bendtsen wrote:
>>>> Tom Sherman wrote:
>>>>> TandemFan wrote:
>>>>> [cross-posted to ARBR for Perry Butler's amusement]
>>>>>> We have a R[ANS] Screamer tandem and there are a few idler rollers
for
>>>>>> the chain.  An outfit sells toothed idlers for about $250:
>>>>>>
http://www.terracycle.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Co...
>>>>>> They have a long blurb on why they are better:
>>>>>>
http://www.terracycle.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Co...
>>>>>> What's the scoop?  Does it make any difference at all, or are we
going
>>>>>> to go faster?
>>>>> Someone needs to tell Pat Franz that it is "RANS" and not "Rans".
>>>>> While the manufacturers in question are trying to meet a price point
>>>>> for their bicycles, they are not going to be putting junk chain
>>>>> idlers on their bicycles [1]. Therefore, while there is room for
>>>>> improvement, the gains will likely be small as drive-train friction
>>>>> is a small component of total non-conservative losses, even on a
>>>>> re***bent with a complicated chain-line.
>>>> Why not avoid idlers and re***bents with complicated chain-lines?
>>>> It might not (yet) be possible with a tandem, but for a single
>>>> rider bike, cruzbike offers a short normal chain-line.
>>> And introduces a whole other set of compromises in seating position,
>> yeah, thats true.
>>
>>> weight distribution, traction on steep hills, etc. Long chain lines
are
>> actually i dont find the traction too bad up hill. But
>> we dont really have hills in Denmark, it's just flat flat
>> flat compared to other places.
>>
>>> not necessarily a bad thing, as several issues with short chain lines
go
>>> away that make wide range gearing difficult.
>> Why would short chainlines make wide range gearing difficult?
> 
> Cross chain without guilt for instance.

Then combine a rohloff/nuvinci + a schlumpf drive == 0 cross chain.
If normal bikes can live with some cross chain, so can a re***bent.



JonB
 




 13 Posts in Topic:
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-04-27 06:51:08 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Jon Bendtsen <noone@[E  2008-04-27 18:43:43 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-04-27 11:49:19 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Jon Bendtsen <noone@[E  2008-04-28 00:37:45 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-04-28 21:50:26 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Adam Kadlubek <uzurpat  2008-04-28 02:48:59 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Jon Bendtsen <noone@[E  2008-04-28 13:38:36 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-04-28 21:52:08 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
jobst.brandt@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-29 03:05:39 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-04-28 22:21:53 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Jon Bendtsen <noone@[E  2008-04-29 10:33:10 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
Jon Bendtsen <noone@[E  2008-04-29 12:25:46 
Re: Chain idler efficiency - roller vs. toothed
"Jon" <jonme  2008-04-29 06:23:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 10:30:39 PST 2009.