Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Recumbent > Re: Tom Sherman...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 23 of 110 Topic 4047 of 4210
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

by "Edward Dolan" <edolan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 18, 2008 at 10:37 AM

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But

>> >> we
>> >> now
>> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>>
>> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>>
>> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks 
>> group
>> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause.
You
>> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
>> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>
> Pot calling the kettle black, Ed?  You are both a a stalker and a
> troll!  Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
> your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
> images?  At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
> and who they are.  In that sense, they score much better on the
> objectivity meter.  I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
> medicine.  Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
> heaven.

JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes
from 
the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great is

NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he does 
not have the required stupidity for it.

Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
Trolls 
could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to disrupt 
and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because he 
forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single handedly 
some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what is 
being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a rational 
level.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 




 110 Posts in Topic:
Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-07 21:44:40 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tomkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-07 23:39:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-08 06:50:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-08 14:50:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-09 01:49:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-13 11:09:54 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:28:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tim McNamara <timmcn@[  2008-06-28 12:59:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
The Nelson Paradigm <n  2008-06-28 17:36:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:52:02 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
A Muzi <am@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-28 13:35:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 19:43:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:56:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 05:07:03 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 07:42:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 19:53:05 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 22:00:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-16 12:22:42 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-16 14:55:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-17 10:07:23 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-17 14:53:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-18 05:36:45 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-18 10:37:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-19 10:23:26 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-19 14:14:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-20 08:16:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-20 13:51:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:31:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:45:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 20:03:24 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 21:26:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-21 16:07:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-21 21:45:34 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-23 12:35:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-23 16:43:41 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 12:28:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 17:11:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 17:21:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 22:42:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:03:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-02 02:49:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:05:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-06 06:32:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-06 16:47:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 16:13:04 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 18:51:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 17:42:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 23:38:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 07:43:20 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 19:49:16 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-10 00:55:38 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:43:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:04:27 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:48:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 18:55:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 11:33:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 17:55:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:27:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:00:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:18:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 21:09:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:12:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:00:18 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:22:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:14:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:27:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:04:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 16:52:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:38:00 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:01:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 01:05:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:18:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:45:57 
Taxonomy
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-07-12 07:45:10 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 10:08:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:10:35 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 18:51:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:32:41 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 19:40:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:00:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:46:05 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:11:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:56:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:47:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:00:10 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:50:37 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:06:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:44:55 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:05:06 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:47:49 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 13:57:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:26:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:19:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:31:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:31:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:43:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:29:21 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:33:05 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:52:43 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:44:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:55:41 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:29:34 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-18 17:49:26 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:33:42 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-19 22:14:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-20 10:23:47 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-23 09:42:07 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-23 12:54:53 
Re: Taxonomy
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-07-23 18:43:51 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-24 15:26:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 9:57:10 CST 2008.