Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:2fb20324-fcd7-4716-8cd0-2d457b6382f7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[...]
>> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only
****ed-up
>> wretches can be stalkers.
>
> And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
> stalker.  Care to take a poll?

Who is there to poll? Ed Gin and you destroyed this newsgroup (ARBR) some 
years ago with your childish feud. Even Tom Sherman has left the group 
because of you. He was embarrassed by your stalking of One so Great as 
Myself and couldn't take it anymore.
[...]

>> >> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
>> >> Trolls
>> >> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to 
>> >> disrupt
>> >> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one
because 
>> >> he
>> >> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single 
>> >> handedly
>> >> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to
what 
>> >> is
>> >> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a 
>> >> rational
>> >> level.
>>
>> > So then, you are a responsive troll.  Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>> Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your addled
>> brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll. A
>> RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!
>
> Read what you wrote a dozen times ... "A good troll is NOT a troll",
> and ty to make sense of it. Conan the Librarian, GOOO is merely an
> adjective and in this particular context an inappropriate one.  There
> is no such thing as a GOOD troll.  Remove the adjective, and the
> sentence would read ... "A troll is not a troll ... DUh!!!  Now go
> back and read what I wrote again and substitute the word RESPONSIVE
> for GOOD, since the same applies. Can you be any more dense???

A good troll creates conversation that would otherwise not exist. Ed Dolan

the Great is the 'goodest' troll that has ever been. It is a high honor
and 
a privilege to be in His presence. If He should deign to address you, 
consider yourself truly blessed by the gods.
[...]

> If there were a moderator here, you'd be one of the very first to be
> shown the door.

Nope, I would simply be a bit more careful what I say and how I say it.
But 
since there are no moderators on these newsgroups connected with Usenet,
it 
does not matter what is said or how it is said provided you do not stoop
to 
ultimate stupidity or criminality like Ed Gin did. He was a criminal
vandal 
troll and you made it possible by remonstrating with him. You are culpable

to that extent for having destroyed ARBR as a viable newsgroup.

Ed Gin and JimmyMac destroyed ARBR some years ago. Cowards like Tom
Sherman, 
Jon Meinecke and Peter Clinch stood by and let it happen. Only Ed Dolan
the 
Great acted honorably and indeed heroically and fought the good fight. But

it is easy to destroy a small newsgroup and not so easy to build it up. Ed

Dolan the Great now wishes only to see ARBR dead and buried. The group was

way too cowardly to deserve to live.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota