Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:f18a1f87-5cb9-4e5b-b144-952870d7d422@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jun 21, 9:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:5e8593d6-7237-431d-9bbb-9c3b9e2ff70c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
>
> > No troll is good.  Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
> > indication that you are a moron.  A troll is a troll is a troll, and
> > there is nothing good about a troll.  I used to think you were an
> > egomaniac, but I've changed my mind.  You're a megalomaniac!
>
> You define 'troll' your way and I'll define it my way.
> [...]

>>>I don't define a troll.  I merely accept the commonly recognized
definition of what a troll is.  Defining a troll your way does not
change what constitutes a troll.  A troll is what it is regardless of
your distorted conceptualization.

There is no commonly recognized definition of what a troll is. It is 
whatever someone says it is. It is more name calling than anything else.

> > When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
> > argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
> > what Ed Dolan you did as well.  Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
> > does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
> > insult.  Go figure.
>
> When someone is telling you to go **** yourself, it is a no brainer to
say
> it right back. Once a discussion has descended to name calling, only a 
> naïf
> would engage on any other level. All I ever did was was to tell Ed Gin
to 
> go
> **** himself. That is what you should have done too.

>>>You remonstrated just as I did no matter what spin you vainly attempt
to put on things.  Name calling is NOT "fighting the good fight".
Furthermore, need I remind you in your own words ..."Name calling is
just so infantile that I hate to do it even in retaliation."

That should be the rule, but when confronted with the Devil you have to
deal 
on the Devil's terms. Any other way and you are defeated.

> Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
>
> > past.  Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> > something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> > history.  Dolan just cannot let things go and move on.  He needs to
> > speak with his therapist about this.   Regardless Ed,we've all read
> > this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before.  Give it up
> > clown.  No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> > yourself look foolish.
>
> Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and
who,
> along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
> members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal
vandal
> troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined

> in
> instead of running for the tall grass.

>>>Regurgitated ancient history that Dolan is unable to free himself ...
forever stuck in a yesteryear quagmire that no one except Dolan
remains interested in.

We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota