Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Recumbent > Re: Tom Sherman...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 69 of 110 Topic 4047 of 4210
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

by "Edward Dolan" <edolan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 12, 2008 at 12:38 AM

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:6b1780ac-612c-4e88-ae68-8e0be274ec54@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 11, 7:00 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:555d001e-7c03-4488-b18c-295b5bd74559@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Jul 9, 8:27 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> Why would ANYONE bother posting anything to Usenet if he did not
want 
>> >> an
>> >> audience? You only want an audience of one, namely ME! That is not 
>> >> enough
>> >> for One so Great as Myself!
>>
>> > To obtain information about something, to provide information about
>> > something, to exchange ideas, etc., but what would you know about the
>> > customary an proper use of a Usenet forum.  It isn;t all about you
and
>> > your imagined audience.
>>
>> Usenet is the worst possible place in the world to obtain information. 
>> Hells
>> Bells, I don't even trust Wikipedia all that much. Even exchanging
ideas
>> doesn't amount to a hill of beans. Without a moderator, nothing is 
>> possible.
>>
>> Usenet is strictly for fools and charlatans, idiots and imbeciles,
knaves
>> and scoundrels. You and Ed Gin, the criminal vandal troll, proved that
to 
>> me
>> long ago. Fool me once, your fault; fool me twice, my fault!
>>
>> The one and only purpose of Usenet is to entertain and to amuse. I do 
>> that
>> better than anyone else in cyberspace. It is why I am Great and you 
>> aren't.
>
> Thanks for making my point.   You are a myopic visionary who knows
> nothing of the original design intent of Usenet, preferring to
> transform it into ABUSENET .. a personal cyber-playpen and showcase
> for your unharnessed ego.

JimmyMac and I are FINALLY in agreement. Usenet is indeed ABUSENET. If the

rest of you weren't so naive, that is how you would see it too. All human 
discussion groups MUST have a moderator.  This is as true of a community
of 
scholars as it is true of a community of scofflaws. Democracies are in 
essence Republics with lots of law and order thrown into the mix.

>> >> >> >> Regards,
>>
>> >> >> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> >> >> >> aka
>> >> >> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - 
>> >> >> >> Minnesota
 




 110 Posts in Topic:
Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-07 21:44:40 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tomkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-07 23:39:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-08 06:50:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-08 14:50:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-09 01:49:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-13 11:09:54 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:28:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tim McNamara <timmcn@[  2008-06-28 12:59:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
The Nelson Paradigm <n  2008-06-28 17:36:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:52:02 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
A Muzi <am@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-28 13:35:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 19:43:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:56:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 05:07:03 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 07:42:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 19:53:05 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 22:00:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-16 12:22:42 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-16 14:55:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-17 10:07:23 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-17 14:53:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-18 05:36:45 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-18 10:37:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-19 10:23:26 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-19 14:14:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-20 08:16:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-20 13:51:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:31:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:45:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 20:03:24 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 21:26:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-21 16:07:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-21 21:45:34 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-23 12:35:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-23 16:43:41 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 12:28:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 17:11:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 17:21:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 22:42:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:03:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-02 02:49:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:05:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-06 06:32:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-06 16:47:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 16:13:04 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 18:51:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 17:42:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 23:38:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 07:43:20 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 19:49:16 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-10 00:55:38 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:43:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:04:27 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:48:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 18:55:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 11:33:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 17:55:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:27:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:00:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:18:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 21:09:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:12:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:00:18 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:22:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:14:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:27:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:04:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 16:52:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:38:00 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:01:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 01:05:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:18:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:45:57 
Taxonomy
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-07-12 07:45:10 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 10:08:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:10:35 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 18:51:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:32:41 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 19:40:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:00:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:46:05 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:11:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:56:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:47:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:00:10 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:50:37 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:06:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:44:55 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:05:06 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:47:49 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 13:57:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:26:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:19:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:31:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:31:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:43:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:29:21 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:33:05 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:52:43 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:44:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:55:41 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:29:34 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-18 17:49:26 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:33:42 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-19 22:14:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-20 10:23:47 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-23 09:42:07 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-23 12:54:53 
Re: Taxonomy
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-07-23 18:43:51 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-24 15:26:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 10:48:38 CST 2008.