Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Recumbent > Re: Tom Sherman...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 84 of 110 Topic 4047 of 4210
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

by JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 14, 2008 at 06:47 AM

On Jul 13, 9:46 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:9795b0ea-e194-4529-80b2-b5cb1d51898f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Jul 12, 6:51 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>news:f7bc8249-9a1f-4cf1-aee2-e5e648049ed8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On Jul 12, 12:38 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> JimmyMac and I are FINALLY in agreement. Usenet is indeed
ABUSENET.
>
> >> > NONSENSE!!!  We are not in agreement.  I emphatically stated that
you
> >> > have transformed Usent into ABUSEnet (read misappropriated its use
as
> >> > your personal cyber-playpen to showcase your unharnessed ego).
>
> >> We have different views on what Usenet is all about. Your view is
related
> >> to
> >> offline behavior. My view is strictly an online behavior mode. Never
the
> >> twain shall meet.
> >> [...]
>
> > We do have a different take on the Usenet newsgroup, but not centered
> > upon differing online/offline views.  Usenet has nothing to do with
> > offline anything.
>
> Agreed! Offline is reality; online is fantasy. I know that, you don't!

What I know is that you don't know what I know.

> My view concerning Usenet is about a newsgroup's
>
> > design intent (focus) and how your ONLINE self=servoing, off-topic,
> > contentions behavior that you consider "style" fails to conform to the
> > design intent of the newsgroup.  I trust that clarifies the matter.
>
> You need to immerse yourself in my recent post entitled "Who is Ed Dolan
and
> what is he doing on Usenet?". Once you have understood what you read
there,
> you will be enlightened.

You need to stop giving advice.  Once you do so, I will consider you
to have been enlightened.

> Usenet, regardless of its original design, has changed drastically over
the
> years. It is not now what it was intended to be. Human nature has
changed it
> into unpleasant chat rooms for contentious and argumentative
commentators
> like myself. All discussion groups if they are to be taken seriously
MUST
> have a moderator. There is no other way. Apparently, you are incapable
of
> learning anything from the Ed Gin episode. Just for the record, what did
you
> learn from the Ed Gin episode?

Apparently, you are unable to free yourself from your obsession with
the Ed Gin episode.

> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 




 110 Posts in Topic:
Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-07 21:44:40 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tomkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-07 23:39:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-08 06:50:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-08 14:50:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-09 01:49:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-13 11:09:54 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:28:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tim McNamara <timmcn@[  2008-06-28 12:59:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
The Nelson Paradigm <n  2008-06-28 17:36:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:52:02 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
A Muzi <am@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-28 13:35:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 19:43:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:56:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 05:07:03 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 07:42:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 19:53:05 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 22:00:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-16 12:22:42 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-16 14:55:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-17 10:07:23 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-17 14:53:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-18 05:36:45 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-18 10:37:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-19 10:23:26 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-19 14:14:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-20 08:16:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-20 13:51:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:31:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:45:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 20:03:24 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 21:26:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-21 16:07:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-21 21:45:34 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-23 12:35:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-23 16:43:41 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 12:28:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 17:11:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 17:21:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 22:42:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:03:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-02 02:49:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:05:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-06 06:32:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-06 16:47:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 16:13:04 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 18:51:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 17:42:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 23:38:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 07:43:20 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 19:49:16 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-10 00:55:38 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:43:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:04:27 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:48:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 18:55:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 11:33:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 17:55:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:27:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:00:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:18:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 21:09:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:12:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:00:18 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:22:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:14:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:27:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:04:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 16:52:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:38:00 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:01:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 01:05:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:18:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:45:57 
Taxonomy
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-07-12 07:45:10 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 10:08:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:10:35 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 18:51:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:32:41 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 19:40:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:00:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:46:05 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:11:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:56:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:47:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:00:10 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:50:37 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:06:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:44:55 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:05:06 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:47:49 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 13:57:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:26:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:19:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:31:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:31:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:43:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:29:21 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:33:05 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:52:43 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:44:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:55:41 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:29:34 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-18 17:49:26 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:33:42 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-19 22:14:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-20 10:23:47 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-23 09:42:07 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-23 12:54:53 
Re: Taxonomy
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-07-23 18:43:51 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-24 15:26:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 10:34:11 CST 2008.