Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

On Jul 14, 1:00 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:330fc748-6ca5-414c-a95f-ce8d1a91f865@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...]
>
> >> Usenet, regardless of its original design, has changed drastically
over
> >> the
> >> years. It is not now what it was intended to be. Human nature has
changed
> >> it
> >> into unpleasant chat rooms for contentious and argumentative
commentators
> >> like myself. All discussion groups if they are to be taken seriously
MUST
> >> have a moderator. There is no other way. Apparently, you are
incapable of
> >> learning anything from the Ed Gin episode. Just for the record, what
did
> >> you
> >> learn from the Ed Gin episode?
>
> > Apparently, you are unable to free yourself from your obsession with
> > the Ed Gin episode.
>
> And you are unable to learn anything from anyone. It is why you are so
> unsatisfactory as a correspondent. You actually write a little better
than
> you think. I suggest you write less and think more.

And I suggest that you refrain from giving advice.  No one cares what
you think.  Your jaded opinion matters not because
you matter not.

> You obviously do not
> have a clue about what I mean by offline vs online and the implications
> thereof. That is because you refuse to read anything with comprehension.

I understand perfectly.  Offlline is just not pertinent to online.
Try to stay focused.

> But you are par for the course on Usenet. It is why I enjoy talking to
> myself in preference to talking to dolts such as Usenet furnishes.

Fine.  So, talk to yourself like the kook that you are,  Just don't
put your thoughts into test  on Usenet.  Problem solved.

> >> >> Regards,
>
> >> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> >> aka
> >> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows -
Minnesota