On Fri, 09 May 2008 03:05:28 +0000, Zebee Johnstone wrote:
> Not because they would deliberately lie, but because eyewitness
> evidence is inherently difficult, involved (meaning shook up, angry)
> witnesses are more so, witnesses who have ivolvement with others and
> therefore may have had their recollection tainted by stories are also
> difficult. There's a lot of research on that latter, in that most
> people remember a memory not an incident, and that memory can be
> changed by what others say.
Which sup****ts the case for writing out your recollections immediately
after the incident and date time and witness notifications on it to
sup****t your statement.
|
