On May 9, 12:16 pm, Rory Williams <Rory.Williams.394...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> EuanB Wrote:
>
> > All registration tells the police is who owns the car and the
> > residential address.
>
> > It doesn't tell the police where that person happens to be at a point
> > in time.
>
> > Further the incident has already happened, priority for police
> > resources would ****bably have been given to inicidents where the
police
> > can make a difference, leaving after the fact policing till quieter
> > times, which is sensible.
>
> There was a fairly extensive story about it on PM on ABC radio national
> yesterday afternoon.
>
> '' (http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2239488.htm)
>
> My impression from the story was that Kevin Nichols took the rego
> number and also spoke to the driver of the car.
>
> This makes me think that there should be a good chance of identifying
> the actual driver - particularly if it was the registered owner.
>
> RoryW'transcript' (http://''transcript'
> (http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2239488.htm)'
> (http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2239488.htm))
>
> --
> Rory Williams
Curiouser and curiouser.
Still, having 50 witnesses should make the whole process a bit more
straightforward.
Scenario 1: driver hassles cyclists, shouts at them, buzzes them, then
stops in front of them.
Scenario 2: driver gets past cyclists, then engine stalls.
Only an eyewitness can distinguish these two.
|
