On Tue, 13 May 2008 04:48:35 +0000, fractal wrote:
> Attempting to understand some letter writers who say the bunch cyclists
> should be charged for riding too close together to avoid a collision, I
see
> ARR 126 says " A Driver must drive a sufficient distance behind a
> vehicle....to avoid a collision..", but rule 16 implies a rider is not a
> driver, so 126 doesnt apply to cyclists. However rule 19 says "a
reference
> to a Driver includes a ref to a Rider" so Im confused.
Didn't the nitwit admit to cutting in front of them, aka there is no onus
of travelling a safe stopping distance.
It is going to be interesting to see if "the air bag popped" story holds
up or is JAL?
|
