terryc wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 04:48:35 +0000, fractal wrote:
>
>> Attempting to understand some letter writers who say the bunch cyclists
>> should be charged for riding too close together to avoid a collision, I
see
>> ARR 126 says " A Driver must drive a sufficient distance behind a
>> vehicle....to avoid a collision..", but rule 16 implies a rider is not
a
>> driver, so 126 doesnt apply to cyclists. However rule 19 says "a
reference
>> to a Driver includes a ref to a Rider" so Im confused.
>
> Didn't the nitwit admit to cutting in front of them, aka there is no
onus
> of travelling a safe stopping distance.
>
> It is going to be interesting to see if "the air bag popped" story holds
> up or is JAL?
>
Air Bag? I thought I'd read where he said that he pulled over because
his gas supply wasn't working and he had to switch to petrol??
|
