Talk About Network

Google





Cycling > Nyc Bikes > Re: Slime Self ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 8 Topic 870 of 1041
Post > Topic >>

Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!

by carlfogel@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 2, 2007 at 11:40 PM

On Wed, 02 May 2007 23:27:47 -0600, kwalters <kwalters@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>
>
>carlfogel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 May 2007 22:56:24 -0700, Pista <tcoleman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>We still use traditional tubes, because a single Slime tube will weigh 
>>>more than a pair of tires AND standard tubes combined.
>>>
>>>Just use Tufo tubulars - most reliable tire ever and the reason I still

>>>ride on tubulars on all of my bikes, including my mountain bike.
>>>
>>>If you don't use standard tubular rimes, you can also get almost all of

>>>their tires in a clincher version.  The tire does not contain a tube at

>>>all, and uses a sealant (absolutely nothing like the slime compound) to

>>>fill punctures.  I am on the bike 20 hours a week and have been using 
>>>Tufo tires for over 15 years.  In all that time, I have never, ever had

>>>a flat tire - except for almost every race where I am not allowed to
use 
>>>Tufo's.
>>>
>>>Any shop can order them from the distributor in Canada, or from Airo 
>>>International in California.
>>>
>>>Prisoner at War wrote:
>>>
>>>>The claim is that it "instantly seals punctures up to 1/8" as you
>>>>ride" and "works repeatedly, lasts up to 2 years"...how's this
>>>>possible -- and how's it that we're still using regular tubes, then???
>>>>
>>>>Also, has anyone any experience with gluelss patch kits?  How are
>>>>they, how do they work?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>TIA!
>> 
>> 
>> Dear P & P,
>> 
>> A road Slime tube weighs 180 grams--see the specs tab. Two of them
>> weigh 360 grams:
>> 
>>
http://www.performancebike.com/shop/profile.cfm?SKU=4633&subcategory_ID=5411
>> 
>> A road tube of similar thickness weighs 117 grams--again, see the
>> specs tab. Two of them weigh 234 grams:
>> 
>>
http://www.performancebike.com/shop/profile.cfm?SKU=2294&subcategory_ID=5411
>> 
>> You can get lighter Slime tubes and light ordinary tubes, but this is
>> enough to make the point--a pair of Slime tubes adds a total of about
>> 126 grams to a 700c bicycle and rider.
>> 
>> A 158-lb rider and an 18-lb bicycle weigh 80,000 grams. Replacing the
>> ordinary tubes with Slime tubes adds 126 grams.
>> 
>>  126 / 80,000 = 0.1575%
>> 
>> It is doubtful that any rider can detect a 0.1575% total weight
>> difference while actually riding.
>> 
>> Slime tubes are not popular for several reasons:
>> 
>> 1) Exaggerated fears of weight penalties--see above.
>> 
>> 2) Fuss and trouble with the tire valve and air pressure gauges. The
>> green Slime and wispy white fibers can clog things.
>> 
>> 3) Exaggerated expectations concerning sealants. Slime works best at
>> sealing pinhole punctures from goathead thorns, not at sealing larger
>> punctures and punctures higher up the sidewall.
>> 
>> 4) Most of all, few riders suffer enough flats to see much benefit.
>> 
>> I use Slime tubes because goathead punctures are about as common where
>> I live in Pueblo, Colorado, as rain is in Seattle. I don't carry a
>> rain jacket on my daily ride, so I can understand why few Seattle
>> riders bother with Slime tubes.
>> 
>> So far this year, I've had only 8 flats in 87 fifteen-mile rides, all
>> from goatheads. About half the time, I find the flat tire the next day
>> and can fix it in the comfort of my garage because the Slime let it
>> hold pressure.
>> 
>> Slime tubes probably aren't worth the trouble for glass, nails, rock
>> chips, and big thorns. 
>> 
>> But I find Slime tubes darned useful for goathead pinholes.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Carl Fogel
>
>I like Slime Ultralite tubes. They don't have the white, whispy fibers.
>They are a little heavier than regular light tubes but have a nice high 
>collar around the stem. Stem/tube separation has never been a problem as 
>it has with so many other Presta tubes I have use. I don't, however, 
>like the Slime itself, so I remove the valve core and squeeze out as 
>much of the Slime as I can, and just take my chances with goatheads. The 
>Slime is quite toxic to grass, BTW.
>
>Ken

Dear Ken,

Glad to hear that you found something that suits you, even if it takes
modification.

As for killing the grass, practically any thick but non-toxic liqud
will kill grass if not hosed off.

Slime itself is edible. 

The page that I used to link to on the Slime site has vanished, but
your ice cream probably contains Slime's chief ingredient, propylene
glycol:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/msg/b9c61c2231186e6b

Cheers,

Carl Fogel
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
Pista <tcoleman@[EMAIL  2007-05-01 22:56:24 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
carlfogel@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-02 00:30:37 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
kwalters <kwalters@[EM  2007-05-02 23:27:47 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
carlfogel@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-02 23:40:44 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
"Mike Kruger" &  2007-05-03 22:43:22 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
Zoot Katz <zootkatz@[E  2007-05-03 20:47:19 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
"Kerry Montgomery&qu  2007-05-02 18:02:39 
Re: Slime Self Healing PV Road Tube?!?!
carlfogel@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-05-02 12:25:51 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 18:15:26 PST 2009.