In article <13k3iu0atta17af@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"G.T." <getnews1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> Tom Keats wrote:
>> In article <5qd00tFv2d3qU2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>> Tom Keats wrote:
>>>
>>>> Y'know what? I've heard of women recumbent riders,
>>>> but I've never seen any. Whuzzup with that?
>>> You're in the wrong place, obviously...
>>
>> I'm in RBM. Ed Dolan (Deity bless his shit-disturbing
>> ass) crossposted from ARBR to here.
>>
>>> Pete (married to a recumbent riding woman).
>>
>> I'm sure your recumbent riding wife is a
>> mainstay to you, and I wish both of you a
>> furthermore long & happy relationship.
>>
>> How many other recumbent riding women do you
>> get to see per diem?
>>
>
> I saw 11 on my 3 mile commute to work today. That works out to
> something like 7.2 per mile.
You must live in a very special place.
>What the fuck is wrong with you?
All kinds of stuff. I'm not sure what my worst failing is;
it's so hard to be objective about one's self. I can tell
you what's /right/ with me: I like people. I like you.
>Maybe women avoid you?
Often, they should, and do. Sometimes they should, and don't.
Sometimes they shouldn't, and don't.
But I've heard that the relative number of women cyclists in a
specific locale is an indicator of the bicycle-friendliness of
that locale, so I'm interested. There are a lot of women cyclists
here in Vancouver BC, but I've never seen any riding recumbents.
For some reason I find that notable.
cheers,
Tom
--
Nothing is safe from me.
I'm really at:
tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca
|
