Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Bikes Miscellaneous > Re: HELMETS!!!
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 53 of 131 Topic 11014 of 11844
Post > Topic >>

Re: HELMETS!!!

by Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 5, 2008 at 12:01 AM

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Norman Wilson) writes:
> 
>> Bill Z. <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>> There is an RFC describing the PDF format.  Adobe is going around
>>> modifying it for business reasons, and those changes are not in
>>> the standard.   Is it any surprise that something doesn't work
>>> when you aren't using Adobe products?
>> Can you cite the RFC number?  The nearest I can find is RFC
>> 3778, which is by no means a full description of the format;
>> rather it offers a few notes on usage and a pointer to the
>> separately-published (by Adobe, not by the IETF) PDF Reference
>> Manuals.
> 
> That's the one - but keep in mind the title: "The application/pdf
> Media Type", and that it states
> 
>         This do***ent is intended to provide updated information on
>         the registration of the MIME Media Type "application/pdf",
>         with particular focus on the features that help mitigate
>         security concerns.  This do***ent refers to features
>         do***ented in the PDF References versions 1 [1], 1.3 [2], 1.4
>         [3] and 1.5 [4], as updated by errata [5].
> 
> where the citations are to specific do***ents published by Adobe.
> They just didn't go to the trouble of copying the existing Adobe
> do***ents into the RFC verbatim - a waste of effort.
> 
> You can't expect software developers to figure out what to do with
> a MIME type of the specification of that type can be changed at
> will without updating the specification for what that MIME type
> represents.
> 
> Sherman was complaining about what my software was doing - and that
> software apparently worked correctly - it found an application that
> could handle the MIME type defined in RFC 3778.  It's just that the
> do***ent format  did not match the MIME type.
> 
Nonsense. I am not complaining about Zaumen's software, since I could 
care less what it does and what is does not.

Zaumen when off and falsely accused me of inventing things because his 
software could not view a web page but mine could. I believe I am owed 
an apology on this matter.

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 




 131 Posts in Topic:
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 06:46:43 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Nat <natalie@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 09:08:46 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
"victor.kan@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 10:04:39 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 10:21:47 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 10:31:23 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 23:26:24 
HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 07:54:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCl  2008-05-03 15:25:53 
Re: HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 15:00:12 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 15:16:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCl  2008-05-03 22:22:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 00:08:47 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 19:57:04 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 01:43:41 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 21:01:38 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 20:06:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 22:10:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:45:53 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 11:57:55 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:38:50 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 23:46:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:59:35 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:02:24 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 20:17:39 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 22:27:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:55:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 12:08:22 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:47:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 23:58:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:34:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-06 23:40:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 22:05:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:15:41 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:39:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-08 19:52:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:53:31 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:27:01 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:57:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:23:43 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:51:57 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:18:30 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:09:34 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:37:57 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:32:48 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:12:43 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:57:55 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:33:37 
What's the difference between a pair of two-year-olds and a pair
Rob Lindauer <rlindx@[  2008-05-11 12:46:08 
Re: What's the difference between a pair of two-year-olds and a
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:59:54 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:40:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-05 00:27:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:57:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:01:04 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:27:00 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-06 23:30:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:57:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:16:39 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:41:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:18:13 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:44:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-08 19:54:35 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:54:13 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:22:11 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:53:17 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:24:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:52:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:19:23 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:09:56 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:38:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:10 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:13:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:58:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:34:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:40:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 09:18:30 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 21:13:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 23:48:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:21:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:52:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:26:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:53:38 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:20:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:11:00 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:40:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:15:08 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:59:05 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:35:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
"victor.kan@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:57:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:25:44 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:52:45 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:20:06 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:10:06 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:40:01 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:23 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:14:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:58:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:35:11 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:09 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:12:12 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:41:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:34:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:18:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:59:26 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:36:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:48 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 19:36:42 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-11 01:51:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 08:53:45 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-14 01:52:29 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 07:51:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
frkrygow@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-03 21:23:44 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 23:51:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Rob Lindauer <rlindx@[  2008-05-04 12:34:34 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:47:33 
Re: SEX SELLS
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-04 08:31:40 
Re: SEX SELLS
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 23:57:50 
Re: SEX SELLS
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 07:24:48 
Re: Are you in favor of using sex to sell biking?
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-04 14:51:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 22:21:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:41:49 
Re: HELMETS!!!
norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 01:48:09 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2oo5@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-04 23:27:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-04 23:53:50 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 21:16:41 
Re: I don't advocate using a bike as an actual sex object
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-05 06:38:49 
Re: SEX SELLS
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:07:51 
Re: HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:12:22 
Re: Are you in favor of using sex to sell biking?
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:26:26 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Timothy Baldwin <T.E.B  2008-05-08 18:34:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Aug 29 21:42:42 CDT 2008.