>From my own experience, plus what I've been told by experts, Cannondale
frames tend to run on the small size. I'm 6'0 and find my f300 too
cramped
for my legs. So if you can get a larger frame I'd do so. A "large" frame
is considerably shorter wheel to wheel than my 20" Kona.
<henninrp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1153198690.819548.215090@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> hi all.
>
> I recently discovered a crack in the head tube of my current bike and
> would like to purchase a used one to replace this frame in a pinch
> until i can get the money together for a new bike next season. i know
> it's not ideal, but someone local is selling a 2004 cannondale f300 in
> the "large" frame size. i'm not sure if this might be a hair too big
> for me. i'm 5'11" with a 32" inseam.
>
> anyone happen to know what a "large" equates to in frame inches on a
> 2004 f300? cannondale's site wasn't much help.
>
> thanks a lot!
>
> --
> rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving
> posting problems, or contact the moderators, please see http://rbor.org/
> Please read the charter before posting: http://rbor.org/rbor_charter.txt
>
--
rec.bicycles.off-road is moderated by volunteers. To find help solving
posting problems, or contact the moderators, please see http://rbor.org/
Please read the charter before posting: http://rbor.org/rbor_charter.txt
|
