Re: Problems with the testosterone test

On May 4, 12:41=A0pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> dumbass,
>
> unless there's another puerto - how the **** is DNA going to catch a
> doper ?

You miss the point and crudely at that. Why don't you think about the
bigger picture, learn some complex words and get back to us with a
cogent thought on the topic.

> letters like DNA and GPS are just used to scare dumb athletes.

And apparently a number of frequent RBR posters...

Dope testing groups like WADA would very much like to bank a DNA
sample from each athlete under their purview. They want this in case
there is another Puerto (or another blood shuffling scenario you can
dream up where DNA may prove useful) or quite possibly just to scare
some into not doping. What matters is they would like this sample
regardless of how useful it will be in the end and they will continue
to argue for it.

By using data such as those presented in the drug metabolism paper
under discussion the testers have another lever with which to argue
for the DNA sample. The argument is simple: "These samples will help
us reduce false positives and negatives for this test and that is a
good thing for all parties". That is a decent argument and it will be
persuasive. Once they have the sample they'll do wahtever they want
with it. We've already seen that with historucal use of banked samples
that were supposed to be de-identified.

No matter, y'all just keep dumb assing along and it's almost July.

Mark