Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here

On Tue, 6 May 2008 22:49:23 -0700 (PDT), "bjw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<bjw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On May 6, 9:31 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 com> wrote:
>> "dave a" <blkcatREMOVET...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> news:fvr4q9029s3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> > Tom Kunich wrote:
>> >> Was there a Medieval Warm Period? YES, according to data published
by 532
>> >> individual scientists from 325 separate research institutions in 38
>> >> different countries ... and counting!
>>
>> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_warm_period
>>
>> > The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) states
that the
>> > "idea of a global or hemispheric "Medieval Warm Period" that was
warmer
>> > than today however, has turned out to be incorrect" and that what
those
>> > "records that do exist show is that there was no multi-century
periods
>> > when global or hemispheric temperatures were the same or warmer than
in
>> > the 20th century". Indeed, global temperature records taken from ice
>> > cores, tree rings, and lake deposits, have shown that the Earth was
>> > actually slightly cooler (by 0.03 degrees Celsius) during the
'Medieval
>> > Warm Period' than in the early- and mid-20th century.
>>
>> So NOAA trumps 532 scientists. Who knew?
>
>Kun-Kun,
>
>Your original post doesn't sound like something
>a person would just write and post to Usenet.  In fact,
>a simple Google reveals that you cut-and-pasted it
>from http://www.co2science.org/
, which is a step up
>from stealing your material from couplescompany.com,
>though it's just a slickly designed climate
>disinformation website.  Most people agree there was
>a Medieval Warm Period, they just don't agree that it
>means what "co2science.org" wants it to mean.

I just looked at the web site cited above and it's clearly right out
of the Rush Limbaugh School of Climate Science.


-- 
jeverett3<AT>sbcglobal<DOT>net      (John V. Everett)