On Apr 15, 12:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:c3a0f574-82fb-40e9-8752-e5d43026d3dc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Apr 14, 9:26 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [...]
> >> I do not go for this "different" stuff when it comes to morality. I
> >> expect a
> >> Jewess to be just as good as I would want my wife to be. I guess you
and
> >> I
> >> "differ" in that.
>
> > You are making an assumption (conclusion that does not follow). I set
> > standards in choosing a wife. Who doesn't? I don't happen to
> > consider what Marian wrote to be vulgar or immoral and her ethnicity
> > has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. You seem to have many
> > hangups one of them being the "Jewish issue", another being women in
> > general and Marina just happens to be both.
>
> You have one set of standards for your wife and another set of standards
for
> other women who are not your wife.
Gee, if Ed Dloan says so it just must be so right? NOT!!! I had a
single set of standards for choosing a wife ... PERIOD! Got that?
This is much to do about nothing as concerns this discussion. I do
not have two sets of standards and your incessant regurgitation makes
your fatuous satements no more valid or true than with their first
fallacious utterance.
In other words, it is OK for Marian the
> Jewess to write about peeing on a public forum, but it is not OK for
your
> wife who is not a Jewess to write about peeing on a public forum. Glad
we
> got that straightened out!
IN OTHER WORDS ... you have again employed your favorite logical
fallacy ... Non Sequitur ("It does not follow"). This is the simple
fallacy of stating, as a conclusion, something that does not strictly
follow from the premise,
WE straightened nothing out! Your reading comprehension skills are
pathetic. I will not repeat what I have already said in response to
this absurdity since the many repetitions thus far have exceed your
poor powers of perception and I am not inclined to dumb things down
for someone who asserts that he is great and possesses superior
intelligence. Truth be told, you are as perceptive as the average
tree stump.
>> >> Why cannot you ask her and get an
> >> >> answer from her and report it to the honorable gentlemen of these
> >> >> cycling
> >> >> newsgroups?
>
> >> > For one thing, no one cares and for another ... AND YOU SEEM NOT TO
> >> > GET THIS ... my wife wants no part of your nonsense, but you have
your
> >> > answer and that's all you'll get.
>
> >> Marian the Jewess can say any crappy thing she wants on Usenet, but
not
> >> your
> >> wife? That much I got!
>
> > Like you, Marian can say anything she wants just as you say anything
> > you want. This is an unmoderated forum ... remember? What you
> > DIDN'T GET is that like you, I can approve or disapprove of what
> > someone has to say. You disapproved of what Marian said and I
> > didn't.
>
> But you wouldn't approve of it if your wife had written it? Talk about
double
> standards!
Please be so kind as to cite any reference where I said that under
pain of being considered a LIAR should you fail to do so.
> What you also DIDN"T GET is that I am not my wife' s personal
>
> > censor and she really doesn't require one either. Furthermore, there
> > is no need to even be concerned about what my wife says on Usenet.
> > since she has never made a Usenet post. What don't you understand
> > about all this, since I have repeated this many times now, in the
> > hopes that it would finally sink in? Gee, you are thick headed.
>
> You approve of women talking about peeing on a public forum? Thanks!
I don't disapprove of what Marian said nor the particular way that she
said it, nor did I consider what she said vulgar. I've siad it over
and over and I'm done saying it. Do you enjoy beating a dead horse?.
> That
> tells the rest of us everything we ever have to know about you. You are
not
> only a pathetic stalker who resorts to sexual innuendo and befriends
> criminals like Ed Gin but you also favor discussions about peeing on a
> public forum, especially if such messages are posted by Jewish females.
Your usual, uninspired, cut and paste boilerplate bullshit repeated an
nauseum. With your jaded, twisted perspective on life, you have
virtually nothing in common with your fellow man; and mercifully,
because of your misogynistic demeanor and questionable sexual
orientation, there is no danger of you ever polluting the gene
pool ... AND, that tells us most of what we need to know about you.
> >> > I've been correcting your formatting, but without complaint, but
have
> >> > tired of doing so. Consequently,left the rest as is (see
immediately
> >> > below). You would... should have been preceded by two ">" and
there
> >> > should not have been a blank line preceded by a single ">"
immediately
> >> > following! You complain about others?
>
> >> When I break into a paragraph that is the way it formats. Get used to
it
> >> because I am not going to waste any time cleaning up anything on
Usenet.
> >> Everything else that is wrong with the formatting is due to the
Google
> >> website that you are using. Get a newsreader why don't you - or does
not
> >> your ISP support one?
>
> > All ISPs support a newsreader.
>
> Then use your ISP newsreader instead of the Google Groups website.
We've been down this road many times before. You obviously suffer
from short term memory loss. I dont' tell you what to use. Don't
tell me what to use. I never have and never will take advice from
you. I take advice from people whose opinions I value and you are not
among them.
> I clean up as I go when I break into a
>
> > paragraph. Your laziness is discourteous to the readership.
>
> There is no need to do that as the quotation marks soon follow.
> [...]
Quotation marks aside, your formatting remains a mess. Even the man
from whom you said you learned how to post, who has also criticized
you for you formatting, agrees on this account ...TS.
> >> Just keep telling us how wonderful you think Marian the Jewess is
posting
> >> crap about peeing and I will keep on asking you if your wife approves
of
> >> such female shenanigans.
>
> > You are forever trying to put words in my mouth. I never claimed
> > Marina was wonderful. I don't even know the woman. I merely went on
> > record to indicate that you over-reacted and, unlike you, I was not
> > offended. You can keep asking away, but you'll get no response other
> > than what you already have. Harp on Ed.
>
> But you should have been offended and if you weren't you should at least
> have had the good taste to shut up about it.
Why have you not learned that you cannot determine how others think
and feel and you cannot impose your point of view on another. Did you
ever notice how only one person (MV) ever agrees with you? I'm
willing to cease this discussion having exhausted it. You, however,
are not content to do so ... the earmark of a troll. Guess I'll just
have to terminate it. This has turned into little more that a merry-
go-round ... here we go loop-dee-loop ... you beating a dead horse
over a rather insignificant matter in the greater scheme of things ...
me wasting far to much of my time on all this silliness. ..
> The fact is that you like
> gutter conversations.
You never have been able to sort out the difference between fact an
opinion. You state opinion as though fact and this instance even
label it as such. You have a propensity for gutter conversations, not
me and I have repeatedly indicated that what Marian said and the
manner in which she said it, I did not find vulgar or offensive. You
are hell bent upon ensuring that this incident be perceived as vulgar
and offensive and that's fact but your perception is an opinion as is
mine and you'll not change mine, so stop trying already. You always
have confused fact and opinion and that's a fact ... not opinion.
You like to root in the mud. You proved that much with
> Ed Gin some years ago.
Opinion stated as fact in typical cyclical redundant fashion by a man
with a tortured psyche still firmly ranchored in the past.
> The Great Ed Dolan is also a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint
Edward
> the Great - and He will not abide female sluts (even if they are Jewish)
to
> post messages to these esteemed and honorable cycling newsgroups on
vulgar
> subjects. Vulgarity is next to sinfulness, but you have to be pure of
heart
> and noble of purpose like Saint Edward the Great to know this.
> [...]
Oh Saint Edward ... GO FUCK YOURSELF! Now you have an example of
vulgarity. See the difference or would you only see tha if I were a
Jewish female ... dunderhead?
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
