On Apr 24, 5:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:ee41fc61-0f3c-4099-b9cf-b8618e32df39@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Apr 21, 8:02 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [...]
> >> Because you are a crazy stalker
>
> > You deliberately troll for adversaries in quest for a cyber-skirmish.
> > You love the attention until it becomes too intensely focused . When
> > you encounter an adversary too tenacious, too formidable, who is every
> > bit as stubborn and determined as you, the whining ensues. You find
> > yourself hopelessly embroiled in a cyber-skirmish that you desperately
> > want out of. You move to disen***ber yourself by seeking to discredit
> > and dismiss your adversary by labeling him or her as a stalker. This
> > thinly disguised ploy of yours has failed countless times. Face it.
> > you are your own worst enemy ... a victim of a self-inflicted
> > dilemma.
>
> Nope, I don't give a damn about trolls or any of that nonsense.
Labeling a premise or concept as nonsense, does not undermine its
validity. You don't give a damn about trolls? I rather enjoyed your
unintentional self-deprecation.
>I simply
> state my opinions and let the chips fall where they may.
Yeah we all know that it is all about you and only about you.
>You have never been
> able to figure out what Usenet is for. It is for fun and games. That is
all
> it is for.
Opinion stated as fact. When it comes to the what Usenet is about and
the reason it cam into being , you suffer from clue defficiency
disorder. Usenet is merely a showcase for your unharnessed ego which
fills a social void. You live socially detached in reclusive
solitude, devoid of real-life interpersonal relation****ps. Absorbed
in your own wayward drama, Usenet has become your cyberspace playpen
and serves as ersatz social interaction that only momentarily disrupts
his otherwise self-sequestered isolation. From Usenet, you garners a
twisted sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Without the
lifeblood of the Usenet newsgroup audience to sustain you, your very
existence would be meaningless and empty. What kind of pathetic,
shallow existence is that?
> >> Note how Tom Sherman and I disagree
> >> about almost everything, yet he doesn't stalk me nor I him. That is
> >> normal
> >> among adults without emotional or mental problems.
>
> > Tom may not stalk you, but I you certainly have stalked him at times.
> > You can't possibly be objective about what yourself and what you do.
> > What woudl you know about being withoug emotion or mental problems?
> > Emotional and mental problems you personify, but those who read this
> > are already well aware of that.
>
> You need to ask Tom Sherman if I have ever stalked him like you have me.
Tom
> Sherman, unlike you, has some perspective on Usenet.
> [...]
>
> >> You know, that ****
> >> about "I don't want to hear it. Don't write to me about it again."
>
> > This was said ONLY after you had regurgitated your advice over and
> > over and over ad nauseum (as you are prone to do). You adamantly
> > refused to accept that I did not ask for your advice, did not require
> > your advice and when politely asked to refrain, you persisted. As is
> > customary, you refused to respect my wishes assuming that you knew
> > better ... hell bent upon imposing your will, proving that this was
> > more about you than it ever was about me and Ed Gin.
>
> But I did know better. If and when you do not like advice, then just
ignore
> it, but don't tell others what to say or not to say to you. Who the hell
do
> you think you are to do that anyway? Is that how you treat your wife?
I certainly tried to ignore your advice but you were relentless,
harping and harping in a concerted effort to ensure that I not ignore
your advice. Most rational people when told that their advice is not
required, get the message. You don't, because you are not rational.
If you want to be heard you must first learn to listen and you turn a
deaf ear to others, and yet castigate those who would do the same to
you. What do you not understand about all this?
> > I have to wonder, just how many friends do you have? How many have
> > you ever had? How many successful interpersonal relation****ps have
> > you ever had of any significant duration? How many were with women?
>
> The Great Ed Dolan must always remain mystery to the likes of JimmyMac.
That
> is as it should be. After all, he is ordinary and Ed Dolan the Great is
> extraordinary.
I fully expected this predictable diversionary reply, because the
answers are painfully obvious and reveal much about you the person.
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
