On Apr 24, 3:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:ce411889-da52-402b-916a-10fba83ff997@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Apr 24, 5:12 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [...]
> >> We are both into monologues. No dialogue is possible. You want to
debate
> >> and
> >> all I want to do is state my opinions. It is a take it or leave it
> >> proposition as far as I am concerned.
>
> > Debate is dialogue. "Take it or leave it" opinion is monologue.
> > Thanks for making my point.
>
> I think he is finally starting to get it!
Yep. I get that you don't get it ... that dialogue is requred for
give an tak and all you car about is giving you opinion to those who
dont' value you opinion or advice. That discourage you thogh from
offer what you consider as sound advice and other consider 99% sound
and 1% advice. I'm not starting to get it. I've know this all along.
> >> Tom Sherman learned this many years
> >> ago. I have no more interest in debating him than he does me. Take
the
> >> cue
> >> why don't you!
>
> > Now why do you suppose that is? Well, because Tom undoubtedly
> > realizes that you are, as you have indicate in the past, all about
> > opinion (monologue) and refuse to debate an issue (engage in
> > dialogue). What are you afraid of other than being made out to be
> > wrong? In a recent post, Tom indicated that you are wrong about most
> > things. He's right of course.
>
> Tom Sherman has never been right about anything in his life. He is a
> liberal-socialist-communist. He is also a Palestinian terrorist
sympathizer.
> He is probably going to vote for the Black Man this November if he gets
a
> chance. Just how wrong can one get.
> [...]
Well, there is no point in engaging Tom Sherman in a debate the either
since you have already predetermined that he is wrong headed about
everything, effectively precluding any possibility of dialogue. The
interesting thing is that this is a common theme of your. You seem to
thinkg that only you have a handle on things when in reality you are
the common denominator the antagonist with whom only one agrees
(M.V.)
> >> >> I am here merely to state my opinions and do not give a rat's ass
> >> >> about
> >> >> debate.
>
> >> > Just as well, because your debating skills are virtually
non-existent.
>
> >> No one will debate you because you are so tiresome.
>
> > You won't because you would find yourself disadvantage by ineptitude.
> > Regurgitation of your time-worn opinions is a poor substitute for
> > argument. Repetitious monologue does not constitute dialogue. You
are
> > tedium in the extreme. I guess you forgot that Tom Sherman, one whom
> > you hold in high regard (when you aren't insulting him that is), and I
> > had quite a debate going sometime back.
>
> You confuse arguing and whining with debate. You exasperated him just as
you
> do everyone else, even Ed Gin! But I do not debate because I don't want
to
> be bothered with facts. I am here for opinion only. I leave it to others
> less endowed than myself to supply any needed facts.
I haven't exasperated you, have I? Argument is inherent to debate.
Debate is a discussion in which opposing arguments and reasons are
advanced for and against particulars such as values, policies,
proposals, propositions or concepts. You don't debate because you
don't know how. You've not mastered the art and would rather not risk
looking foolish. You have never been able to discern the distinction
between fact and opinion. You claim to be uninterested in facts and
are all about opinion, well then why not engage in debate? I thought
you relished a good scrap ... maybe just with inferiors whom you can
more readily win out over? You merely state an opinion without
entering into debate concerning an opinion. Consequently you engage
only in monologue rather than dialogue. How boring is that?
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
