"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:e493284d-8307-4698-a603-2139ba279af5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 24, 3:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:ce411889-da52-402b-916a-10fba83ff997@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Apr 24, 5:12 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> We are both into monologues. No dialogue is possible. You want to
>> >> debate
>> >> and
>> >> all I want to do is state my opinions. It is a take it or leave it
>> >> proposition as far as I am concerned.
>>
>> > Debate is dialogue. "Take it or leave it" opinion is monologue.
>> > Thanks for making my point.
>>
>> I think he is finally starting to get it!
>
> Yep. I get that you don't get it ... that dialogue is requred for
> give an tak and all you car about is giving you opinion to those who
> dont' value you opinion or advice. That discourage you thogh from
> offer what you consider as sound advice and other consider 99% sound
> and 1% advice. I'm not starting to get it. I've know this all along.
Yup ... I am all about opinion and nothing else. Now go and sin no more!
Say
100 Our Fathers and 1000 Hail Marys for your penance.
>> >> Tom Sherman learned this many years
>> >> ago. I have no more interest in debating him than he does me. Take
the
>> >> cue
>> >> why don't you!
>>
>> > Now why do you suppose that is? Well, because Tom undoubtedly
>> > realizes that you are, as you have indicate in the past, all about
>> > opinion (monologue) and refuse to debate an issue (engage in
>> > dialogue). What are you afraid of other than being made out to be
>> > wrong? In a recent post, Tom indicated that you are wrong about most
>> > things. He's right of course.
>>
>> Tom Sherman has never been right about anything in his life. He is a
>> liberal-socialist-communist. He is also a Palestinian terrorist
>> sympathizer.
>> He is probably going to vote for the Black Man this November if he gets
a
>> chance. Just how wrong can one get.
>> [...]
>
> Well, there is no point in engaging Tom Sherman in a debate the either
> since you have already predetermined that he is wrong headed about
> everything, effectively precluding any possibility of dialogue. The
> interesting thing is that this is a common theme of your. You seem to
> thinkg that only you have a handle on things when in reality you are
> the common denominator the antagonist with whom only one agrees
> (M.V.)
I am not interested in debating anyone! I never have been and I never will
be. Why? Because I know what I know and I don't give a good god damn what
anyone else thinks about anything. Clear enough for you?
>> >> >> I am here merely to state my opinions and do not give a rat's ass
>> >> >> about
>> >> >> debate.
>>
>> >> > Just as well, because your debating skills are virtually
>> >> > non-existent.
>>
>> >> No one will debate you because you are so tiresome.
>>
>> > You won't because you would find yourself disadvantage by ineptitude.
>> > Regurgitation of your time-worn opinions is a poor substitute for
>> > argument. Repetitious monologue does not constitute dialogue. You
are
>> > tedium in the extreme. I guess you forgot that Tom Sherman, one whom
>> > you hold in high regard (when you aren't insulting him that is), and
I
>> > had quite a debate going sometime back.
>>
>> You confuse arguing and whining with debate. You exasperated him just
as
>> you
>> do everyone else, even Ed Gin! But I do not debate because I don't want
>> to
>> be bothered with facts. I am here for opinion only. I leave it to
others
>> less endowed than myself to supply any needed facts.
>
> I haven't exasperated you, have I? Argument is inherent to debate.
> Debate is a discussion in which opposing arguments and reasons are
> advanced for and against particulars such as values, policies,
> proposals, propositions or concepts. You don't debate because you
> don't know how. You've not mastered the art and would rather not risk
> looking foolish. You have never been able to discern the distinction
> between fact and opinion. You claim to be uninterested in facts and
> are all about opinion, well then why not engage in debate? I thought
> you relished a good scrap ... maybe just with inferiors whom you can
> more readily win out over? You merely state an opinion without
> entering into debate concerning an opinion. Consequently you engage
> only in monologue rather than dialogue. How boring is that?
"I am not interested in debating anyone! I never have been and I never
will
be. Why? Because I know what I know and I don't give a good god damn what
anyone else thinks about anything. Clear enough for you?" - Ed Dolan
>> >> Regards,
>>
>> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> >> aka
>> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
|
