Re: Bolivia's 'Death Road' claims life of U.S. road cyclist

"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fv35n6$1gn$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Siskuwihane wrote:
>> On Apr 27, 12:34 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>> marika wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Mike Vandeman" <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:7l381494i6njtln3dfovh37g1pm2279pnt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Every one of your posts is a lie, since you don't use your real
name.
>>>> when did they write the law(s) that require using real names and or
>>>> telling the truth on usenet.
>>> It all goes to accountability and therefore credibility - if a sock
>>> puppet becomes discredited, it can be tossed for a new one.
>>
>>
>> Mike uses his real name and has ZERO credibilty.
>
> The scary part is that Mikey V. probably believes on what he is posting,

> unlike some anonymous trolls whose intent is to stir things up.
>


That's certainly true. Mike believes in his propoganda, and is convinced
he 
is doing good.

The irony is, if one assumes he is 100% correct and we start listening to 
him tomorrow at 0600 hrs, and keep it up for the remainder of all
eternity, 
the best we can hop for is the preservation of 0.004% of the environment.
(I 
might have the decimal point in the wrong place, and then Mike will save 
0.0004% of the environment.)

Saving habitat is a noble goal, but saving the equivelent of a tennis
court 
in a square mile is not much of an accomplishment.

Mike is on a misguided mission to do nothing. He has his heart in the
right 
place, but his head is all ****ed up. This is not news to him, indeed I 
fully expect a fresh round of "DUH!" and "LIAR". But, I can do the math
that 
comes to the 0.0004%, if anybody cares.

Clearly the habitat needs guys like Mike, but his agenda is all messed up.

Sad really. Environmental isues are macro, Mike is a micro kind of guy. 
That's his problem.