Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Societal issues > Re: HELMETS!!!
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 27 of 131 Topic 2687 of 3037
Post > Topic >>

Re: HELMETS!!!

by Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 4, 2008 at 12:08 PM

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.thespincycle.com/files/2006LoriCommercial.pdf
>>>> Adobe® Clip Notes® as I posted above?
>>> Oh, just to show what a fool Tom Sherman is, I used a program I have
>>> that prints the HTTP response headers.  Here's what you get:
>>> Status: 200 OK
>>> ...
>>> Content-Type: application/pdf
>>> ...
>>> Content-Length: 2090466
>>> Note the Content-Type header - it claims the file is a PDF file. The
>>> extension ".pdf" is the extension normally used by a PDF file. So,
>>> do you think it is surprising that my browser would try to open it
>>> as a PDF file?
>>> Nothing about some special "Adobe® Clip Notes®" format was given.
>>>
>> Yo Zaumen,
>>
>> My browser also opens the link as a PDF.
>>
>> When I go to the link, it says "Adobe® Clip Notes®" right above the
>> black box displayed on the page.
> 
> There is an RFC describing the PDF format.  Adobe is going around
> modifying it for business reasons, and those changes are not in
> the standard.   Is it any surprise that something doesn't work
> when you aren't using Adobe products?
> 
You are the expert, no? I made no previous comment on the surprising 
nature or lack thereof.
> 
>> Furthermore, the dialog box that appears says, "This PDF uses Adobe
>> Clip Notes technology to allow you to review a movie and to add
>> comments...."
> 
> .... nope - no such dialog box appears - not with my PDF viewer.

Well it does on mine (actually in the PDF window Firefox opens).

> You showed your ignorance on that one - assuming your system behaves
> like everyone else's.
> 
I have not examined other people systems.

How the hell can it be ignorant to re****t exactly what one sees? 
Zaumen's lack of logic here is truly bizarre.

>> Then player controls and a box to allow review comments appears below
>> the "black box" that allows one to play the video clip.
> 
> ... same thing ... new adobe product that "extends" a standard but
> doesn't tell you.
> 
So? Again for slow on the uptake, I am re****ting on what happens on MY 
system. Duh!

Adobe tells us the Clip Notes is being used by the logo and dialog box 
appearing on the screen. Duh!

>> To bad computer expert Zaumen can not get his computer to work with
>> the web page, so he would not look like a fool for calling me a fool,
> 
> No, you are are the fool.  I simply don't bother with Adobe's viewer
> for a variety of reasons, including package management.  Read up on
> it if you are not familiar with the concept.
> 
No Zaumen, you are a fool for claiming I was a fool for saying Adobe® 
Clip Notes® was involved, when the evidence of such is easily obtained 
by anyone who system has Adobe's viewer installed.

You can not make an event that actually occurred go away just because 
you think it should not have happened. Duh!

> Sherman, you really are an idiot.
> 
Accurately re****ting what appears on a computer monitor is a sign of 
idiocy, just because it disagrees with The Great Bill Zaumen's 
assumptions? WOW!

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 




 131 Posts in Topic:
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 06:46:43 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Nat <natalie@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 09:08:46 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
"victor.kan@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 10:04:39 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 10:21:47 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 10:31:23 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 23:26:24 
HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 07:54:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCl  2008-05-03 15:25:53 
Re: HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 15:00:12 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 15:16:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCl  2008-05-03 22:22:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 00:08:47 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 19:57:04 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 01:43:41 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 21:01:38 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 20:06:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 22:10:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:45:53 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 11:57:55 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:38:50 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 23:46:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:59:35 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:02:24 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 20:17:39 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 22:27:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:55:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 12:08:22 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:47:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 23:58:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:34:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-06 23:40:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 22:05:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:15:41 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:39:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-08 19:52:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:53:31 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:27:01 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:57:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:23:43 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:51:57 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:18:30 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:09:34 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:37:57 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:32:48 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:12:43 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:57:55 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:33:37 
What's the difference between a pair of two-year-olds and a pair
Rob Lindauer <rlindx@[  2008-05-11 12:46:08 
Re: What's the difference between a pair of two-year-olds and a
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:59:54 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:40:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-05 00:27:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:57:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:01:04 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:27:00 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-06 23:30:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:57:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:16:39 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:41:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:18:13 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:44:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-08 19:54:35 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:54:13 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:22:11 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:53:17 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:24:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:52:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:19:23 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:09:56 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:38:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:10 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:13:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:58:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:34:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:40:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 09:18:30 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 21:13:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 23:48:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:21:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:52:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:26:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:53:38 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:20:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:11:00 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:40:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:15:08 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:59:05 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:35:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
"victor.kan@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:57:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:25:44 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:52:45 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:20:06 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:10:06 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:40:01 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:23 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:14:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:58:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:35:11 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:09 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:12:12 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:41:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:34:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:18:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:59:26 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:36:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:48 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 19:36:42 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-11 01:51:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 08:53:45 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-14 01:52:29 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 07:51:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
frkrygow@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-03 21:23:44 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 23:51:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Rob Lindauer <rlindx@[  2008-05-04 12:34:34 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:47:33 
Re: SEX SELLS
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-04 08:31:40 
Re: SEX SELLS
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 23:57:50 
Re: SEX SELLS
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 07:24:48 
Re: Are you in favor of using sex to sell biking?
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-04 14:51:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 22:21:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:41:49 
Re: HELMETS!!!
norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 01:48:09 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2oo5@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-04 23:27:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-04 23:53:50 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 21:16:41 
Re: I don't advocate using a bike as an actual sex object
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-05 06:38:49 
Re: SEX SELLS
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:07:51 
Re: HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:12:22 
Re: Are you in favor of using sex to sell biking?
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:26:26 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Timothy Baldwin <T.E.B  2008-05-08 18:34:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 4:53:25 CDT 2008.