Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Societal issues > Re: HELMETS!!!
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 35 of 131 Topic 2687 of 3033
Post > Topic >>

Re: HELMETS!!!

by Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 07:52 PM

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> 
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>>>
>>> You misquoted me, asshole.
>> Ooooh - Little Billy used a naughty word!!!
>> Direct citation for the misquote please.
> 
> Sherman, I'm not going to play your "waste my time by
> getting me to go through old posts" game, particular
> when you gave an example in the post I'm replying to
> (see below).
> 
>> I did not post anything claiming to be a quote from Zaumen with
>> altered text (other than possibly some snipping indicated by ellipses,
>> which of course is perfectly proper), so Zaumen must be either
>> mistaken or lying.
> 
> You don't have to literally quote text when you state that
> someone said something they didn't say.
> 
Zaumen obviously does not understand what a quote is.

>> Ranting generally implies a disregard for reality, which was not
>> evident. The real disregard for reality is believing that foam bicycle
>> hats are effective in reducing serious head injuries and deaths.
> 
> The term "ranting" is quite appropriate for your anti-helmet
> posts.
> 
Where is the properly done study that shows foam bicycle hats to be 
effective in preventing serious head injuries and deaths?

>>>>>> Other people have no problem viewing the video clip.
>>>>> So what?
>>>> So why did Zaumen imply that I was inventing what was on the page?
> 
> ... see - an example of the sort of  misquoting I mentioned since
> I never implied that: I listed several alternatives ranging from
> imagining something to ranting, and I stated that my viewer didn't
> show the clip (so I had no way of telling).
> 
Gee, I would have thought a computer expert would have found a way to 
view the clip, instead of making himself look foolish.

> "Imagining" something might include a clip that merely showed
> someone incidentally wearing a helmet - given Sherman's opinions,
> it wouldn't surprise me if even that would set him off.
> 
Well, helmets are not really harmful compared to bicycle lanes.

> <rest of this moron's rant snipped>
> 
By Zaumen's standards the above is a lie, since I have proof from a 
licensed professional that I am not a moron.

-- 
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
 




 131 Posts in Topic:
If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 06:46:43 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Nat <natalie@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-02 09:08:46 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
"victor.kan@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 10:04:39 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 10:21:47 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-02 10:31:23 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-02 23:26:24 
HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 07:54:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCl  2008-05-03 15:25:53 
Re: HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 15:00:12 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 15:16:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCl  2008-05-03 22:22:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 00:08:47 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 19:57:04 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 01:43:41 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 21:01:38 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 20:06:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 22:10:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:45:53 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 11:57:55 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:38:50 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 23:46:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:59:35 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:02:24 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-03 20:17:39 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 22:27:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:55:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 12:08:22 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:47:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-04 23:58:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:34:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-06 23:40:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 22:05:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:15:41 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:39:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-08 19:52:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:53:31 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:27:01 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:57:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:23:43 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:51:57 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:18:30 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:09:34 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:37:57 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:32:48 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:12:43 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:57:55 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:33:37 
What's the difference between a pair of two-year-olds and a pair
Rob Lindauer <rlindx@[  2008-05-11 12:46:08 
Re: What's the difference between a pair of two-year-olds and a
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:59:54 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:40:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-05 00:27:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 21:57:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:01:04 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:27:00 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-06 23:30:21 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 21:57:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:16:39 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:41:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-07 21:18:13 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-07 21:44:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-08 19:54:35 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-08 19:54:13 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:22:11 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:53:17 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:24:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:52:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:19:23 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:09:56 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:38:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:10 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:13:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:58:19 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:34:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:40:52 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 09:18:30 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 21:13:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 23:48:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 02:21:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 06:52:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:26:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:53:38 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:20:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:11:00 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:40:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:51 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:15:08 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:59:05 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:35:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:33 
Re: HELMETS!!!
"victor.kan@[EMAIL P  2008-05-09 06:57:37 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-09 19:25:44 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 21:52:45 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 03:20:06 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:10:06 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:40:01 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:33:23 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:14:29 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:58:40 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:35:11 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:09 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 13:12:12 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-10 20:41:46 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 21:34:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 02:18:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 07:59:26 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 11:36:28 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 11:41:48 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-12 19:36:42 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-11 01:51:14 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-11 08:53:45 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-14 01:52:29 
Re: HELMETS!!! (Bike Lanes! Vehicular Cycling! Guns! Abortion!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-14 07:51:07 
Re: HELMETS!!!
frkrygow@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-03 21:23:44 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-03 23:51:59 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Rob Lindauer <rlindx@[  2008-05-04 12:34:34 
Re: HELMETS!!!
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 09:47:33 
Re: SEX SELLS
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-04 08:31:40 
Re: SEX SELLS
Jym Dyer <jym@[EMAIL P  2008-05-08 23:57:50 
Re: SEX SELLS
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 07:24:48 
Re: Are you in favor of using sex to sell biking?
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-04 14:51:18 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-04 22:21:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 00:41:49 
Re: HELMETS!!!
norman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-06 01:48:09 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2oo5@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-04 23:27:03 
Re: HELMETS!!!
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-04 23:53:50 
Re: HELMETS!!!
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-05-05 21:16:41 
Re: I don't advocate using a bike as an actual sex object
ComandanteBanana <noli  2008-05-05 06:38:49 
Re: SEX SELLS
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:07:51 
Re: HELMETS!!! (was: If I were to promote the benefits of biking
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:12:22 
Re: Are you in favor of using sex to sell biking?
GeneralissimoApeshit <  2008-05-07 09:26:26 
Re: If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady
Timothy Baldwin <T.E.B  2008-05-08 18:34:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Aug 28 4:42:18 CDT 2008.