Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

On Jun 18, 10:37 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>>news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me.
But
> >> >> we
> >> >> now
> >> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>
> >> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>
> >> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the
kooks
> >> group
> >> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause.
You
> >> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
> >> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>
> > Pot calling the kettle black, Ed?  You are both a a stalker and a
> > troll!  Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
> > your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
> > images?  At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
> > and who they are.  In that sense, they score much better on the
> > objectivity meter.  I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
> > medicine.  Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
> > heaven.
>
> JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes
from
> the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great
is
> NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he
does
> not have the required stupidity for it.

I never said I was a troll.  I said you were a troll and a stalker and
you are.  You have stalked Tom Sherman for years.  As concerns not
being a troll, you have several times admitted to being a troll though
you have often qualified that by stating that you were a "good
troll" ... an oxymoron, of course.

> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
Trolls
> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to
disrupt
> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because he
> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single
handedly
> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what
is
> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a rational
> level.

So then, you are a responsive troll.  Thanks for clearing that up.

> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota