Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:87ddbdc7-eb06-4bb9-8c98-f3e9301f5de6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jun 18, 10:37 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
>>news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. 
>> >> >> But
>> >> >> we
>> >> >> now
>> >> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>>
>> >> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>>
>> >> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the
kooks
>> >> group
>> >> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost
cause. 
>> >> You
>> >> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he
a
>> >> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>>
>> > Pot calling the kettle black, Ed?  You are both a a stalker and a
>> > troll!  Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
>> > your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
>> > images?  At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny
what
>> > and who they are.  In that sense, they score much better on the
>> > objectivity meter.  I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
>> > medicine.  Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
>> > heaven.
>>
>> JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes

>> from
>> the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great

>> is
>> NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he
does
>> not have the required stupidity for it.
>
> I never said I was a troll.  I said you were a troll and a stalker and
> you are.  You have stalked Tom Sherman for years.  As concerns not
> being a troll, you have several times admitted to being a troll though
> you have often qualified that by stating that you were a "good
> troll" ... an oxymoron, of course.

I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only ****ed-up 
wretches can be stalkers. Tom Sherman and I dueled as equals. As much as I

disliked his political opinions (he was a liberal ideologue), I at least 
respected him. That is more than I can say for you. A stalker is even
lower 
than a troll.

>> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said. 
>> Trolls
>> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to
disrupt
>> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because
he
>> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single
handedly
>> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what
is
>> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a
rational
>> level.
>
> So then, you are a responsive troll.  Thanks for clearing that up.

Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your addled 
brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll. A 
RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!

Ed Gin was a troll and a criminal one to boot (he forged names and 
addresses). The kooks group are trolls. None of them are responsive nor
are 
they good. They mean to disrupt and to destroy. That is what trolls do. 
Usenet is the pits because there is no way to prevent any of this. All 
newsgroups must have a moderator that will edit (censor) what gets said. 
There is no other way.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota