Re: Why Is the Supply of IDIOT Mountain Bikers ENDLESS???

Mike Vandeman <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> On 18 Jun 2008 21:45:28 -0700, nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Bill Z.)
> wrote:
> 
> >Mike Vandeman <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >
> >> On 14 Jun 2008 23:47:17 -0700, nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Bill Z.)
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >> No one knows what it means, including the author. Surely, you must
> >> >> have more im****tant things to do? Oh, I forgot, it's you. Forget I
> >> >> said that. I KNOW you don't have anything better to do.
> >> >
> >> >ROTFLMAO.  *You* get caught violating U.S. copyright laws and
instead
> >> >of cleaning up your act, you try to attack the messenger. Both of
them.
> >> 
> >> Right. A victimless "crime".
> >
> >Not true - if the author decided to publish the email he sent you in a
> >mountain-biking magazine (for example), having it appear first on
> >usenet would reduce the interest the magazine would have in it.  So
> >you did violate the law in a way that could hurt someone economically,
> >at least in principle.
> 
> Not in reality, where most of us live. Show us the marketable part of
> that email! This should be good!

Irrelevant - you claimed that copyright infringement was a victimless
crime and it clearly isn't.

-- 
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB