Yeah, he lied and were I that person running, I would be suing the OP
for defamation of character for linking my pic to you.
Of course, you have never lied.
j.
On Jun 14, 2:05=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:59:59 -0700 (PDT), "maguahi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>
>
>
> <maguahi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Jun 14, 2:32=A0am, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bill Z.) wrote:
> >> Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >> > On 13 Jun 2008 18:10:26 -0700, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bill Z.)
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > >Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> >> > >> X-Apparently-To: mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
via 68.142.199.94; Fri, 13
J=
un
> >> > >> 2008 11:15:29 -0700
> >> > ><email from someone else posted to newsgroup snipped>
>
> >> > >You might want to read <http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html>
> >> > >before posting (and therefore publi****ng) =A0email authored by
some=
one
> >> > >else. =A0You should note that a copyright notice is no longer
> >> > >required and that registration is no longer required:
>
> >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0"Notice was required under the 1976 Copyright Act.
=
This
> >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0requirement was eliminated when the United States
a=
dhered to
> >> > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the Berne Convention, effective March 1, 1989."
>
> >> > The best way to deal with harassment is to make it public. DUH! Did
> >> > you have a valid) point? It's interesting that you would side with
t=
he
> >> > person doing the harassment, rather than the person being
harassed..=
...
>
> >> Suggesting that you think about obeying copyright laws is somehow
> >> siding with someone harassing you? =A0Vandeman, you are truly an
idiot=
..
>
> >> You could have complied with the law by simply paraphrasing what he
> >> sent you, or if it was a bona fide attempt at harassment, you could
> >> have simply re****ted it to the police.
>
> >> --
> >> My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >If you want copyright violations. Check out his entire site. No
> >oriiginal content at all. all quotes from others because he hasn't a
> >bit of info himself...He even claimed to write a book on mountain
> >biking but has yet to produce the name. He does "reviews of
> >literature" which anyone can do...probably learned most of his
> >reviewing when working for that technology company he works for...the
> >same one that RAPES the wild in the name of new technology. He's a
> >fraud and fake...Oh yeah...and he can't tell the difference between
> >his name and Mike VANDERMAN which is always his defense against my
> >posts. He's an asshole.
>
> Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED:
>
> "I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is
> trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for
> a laugh.
>
> http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg"
>
> You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty.
> --
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
=
fond of!
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
|
