Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

On Jun 20, 1:51 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:2fb20324-fcd7-4716-8cd0-2d457b6382f7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [...]
> >> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only
****ed-up
> >> wretches can be stalkers.
>
> > And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
> > stalker.  Care to take a poll?
>
> Who is there to poll? Ed Gin and you destroyed this newsgroup (ARBR)
some
> years ago with your childish feud. Even Tom Sherman has left the group
> because of you. He was embarrassed by your stalking of One so Great as
> Myself and couldn't take it anymore.
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> >> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being
said.
> >> >> Trolls
> >> >> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to
> >> >> disrupt
> >> >> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one
because
> >> >> he
> >> >> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single
> >> >> handedly
> >> >> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to
what
> >> >> is
> >> >> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a
> >> >> rational
> >> >> level.
>
> >> > So then, you are a responsive troll.  Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> >> Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your
addled
> >> brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll.
A
> >> RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!
>
> > Read what you wrote a dozen times ... "A good troll is NOT a troll",
> > and ty to make sense of it. Conan the Librarian, GOOD is merely an
> > adjective and in this particular context an inappropriate one.  There
> > is no such thing as a GOOD troll.  Remove the adjective, and the
> > sentence would read ... "A troll is not a troll ... DUh!!!  Now go
> > back and read what I wrote again and substitute the word RESPONSIVE
> > for GOOD, since the same applies. Can you be any more dense???
>
> A good troll creates conversation that would otherwise not exist.

No troll is good.  Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
indication that you are a moron.  A troll is a troll is a troll, and
there is nothing good about a troll.  I used to think you were an
egomaniac, but I've changed my mind.  You're a megalomaniac!

> Ed Dolan
> the Great is the 'goodest' troll that has ever been. It is a high honor
and
> a privilege to be in His presence. If He should deign to address you,
> consider yourself truly blessed by the gods.
> [...]

Delusion must be such a comfort.

> > If there were a moderator here, you'd be one of the very first to be
> > shown the door.
>
> Nope, I would simply be a bit more careful what I say and how I say it.
But
> since there are no moderators on these newsgroups connected with Usenet,
it
> does not matter what is said or how it is said provided you do not stoop
to
> ultimate stupidity or criminality like Ed Gin did. He was a criminal
vandal
> troll and you made it possible by remonstrating with him. You are
culpable
> to that extent for having destroyed ARBR as a viable newsgroup.

This opinionated nonsense stated as though factual has already been
regurgitated countless times.  Your contention is no more valid or
true than it was with its initial utterance.  ****can your fallacious,
meaningless cut and paste boilerplate.  Get some new material why
don't you.  Your material is about as old as you are.  You are boring
the reader****p to death with your crap.

> Ed Gin and JimmyMac destroyed ARBR some years ago. Cowards like Tom
Sherman,
> Jon Meinecke and Peter Clinch stood by and let it happen. Only Ed Dolan
the
> Great acted honorably and indeed heroically and fought the good fight.
But
> it is easy to destroy a small newsgroup and not so easy to build it up.
Ed
> Dolan the Great now wishes only to see ARBR dead and buried. The group
was
> way too cowardly to deserve to live.

When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
what Ed Dolan you did as well.  Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
insult.  Go figure.  Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
past.  Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
history.  Dolan just cannot let things go and move on.  He needs to
speak with his therapist about this.   Regardless Ed,we've all read
this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before.  Give it up
clown.  No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
yourself look foolish.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota