Mike Vandeman <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> On 22 Jun 2008 21:48:39 -0700, nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bill Z.)
> wrote:
>
> >Mike Vandeman <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >
> >> On 21 Jun 2008 23:57:09 -0700, nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bill Z.)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Mike Vandeman <mjvande@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> >> >Irrelevant - you claimed that copyright infringement was a
victimless
> >> >> >> >crime and it clearly isn't.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If the email isn't marketable, then he hasn't been victimized.
I've
> >> >> >> taken nothing of value. On the contrary, it is WORTHLESS. Hence
the
> >> >> >> only victim is ME.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If you break into a car and steal a radio from it, you've
committed a
> >> >> >crime even if the radio is broken and not reparable, and hence
> >> >> >worthless.
> >> >>
> >> >> WRONG. I would have done him a FAVOR to remove that trash -- a
> >> >> victimless crime.
> >> >
> >> >Run that one past a judge. Or better yet, try it as an experiment,
> >> >repeating enough times to get cought. My guess is that we might be
> >> >spared from your presense on usenet for some time.
> >>
> >> I know that mountain bikers would LOVE for me to stop telling the
> >> truth about their selfish, destructive, disgusting s****t, but it
isn't
> >> going to happen, and my postings to the newsgroups will be around
> >> forever, even after I'm gone, to carry on my message. What's YOUR
> >> excuse for living?
> >
> >Non sequitur (due to having no cogent reply), plus showing an arrogant
> >disregard for human life.
>
> I knew you couldn't answer that, because you HAVE no good excuse for
> living. You are a waste of good protoplasm.
Vandeman, go f___ yourself. That's the only response you deserve.
--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
|
