Re: Are SUVs "evil" and bikes "good"?

On Jun 26, 5:40=A0pm, Tim McNamara <tim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <58eefafd-0bdd-40e7-bd2c-350c9dbb4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
>
>
>
>
> =A0KingOfTheApes <comandante.ban...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 9:27=A0pm, Tim McNamara <tim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <b96fbe53-7005-41ac-b78e-935e15e8e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> > > =A0KingOfTheApes <comandante.ban...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > On Jun 25, 5:52=A0pm, Tim McNamara <tim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > No, you nutcase, SUVs are not evil and bikes are not good.
> > > > > =A0They are inanimate objects with no moral properties
> > > > > whatsoever.
>
> > > > > You really need to learn something im****tant here: =A0being
> > > > > anti-car !=3D being pro-bike. =A0Bring pro-bike !=3D being
anti-c=
ar.
>
> > > > > Being a repetitive sock puppet troll =3D idiot, however.
=A0You'r=
e
> > > > > giving those of us who *are* pro-bike a bad name in the
> > > > > newsgroups where you cross-post this blather. =A0Cut it out, you
> > > > > pathetic attention-seeking whiner.
>
> > > > > Does that clear things up for you?
>
> > > > No, you can't please God and the Devil at the same time. If
> > > > there's no evil in SUVs, then who's evil, the driver? Well, there
> > > > has to be a hope for him, some incentive, right?
>
> > > > It's better you drop the SUV, but some are just "elitist" riders.
> > > > ;)
>
> > > Evil, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. =A0Maybe you need
> > > to look in the mirror.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > That's true. Most of the world regards SUVs and evil.
>
> That's not even coherent. =A0Do you have some meds you're supposed to be
> taking?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

"Most of the world regards SUVs as evil."

Is that hard to figure out?