On Jun 28, 1:10=A0am, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bill Z.) wrote:
> Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > On 27 Jun 2008 12:21:31 -0700, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BillZ.)
> > wrote:
>
> > >Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > >> On 26 Jun 2008 18:55:14 -0700, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BillZ.)
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> >Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > >> >> On 25 Jun 2008 23:19:52 -0700, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BillZ.)
> > >> >> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > >> >> >> On 22 Jun 2008 21:48:39 -0700, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bill=
Z.)
> > >> >> >> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > >> >> >> >> On 21 Jun 2008 23:57:09 -0700, nob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B=
illZ.)
> > >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Irrelevant - you claimed that copyright
infringement=
was a victimless
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >crime and it clearly isn't.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> If the email isn't marketable, then he hasn't been
vi=
ctimized. I've
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> taken nothing of value. On the contrary, it is
WORTHL=
ESS. Hence the
> > >> >> >> >> >> >> only victim is ME.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> >If you break into a car and steal a radio from it,
you'=
ve committed a
> > >> >> >> >> >> >crime even if the radio is broken and not reparable,
an=
d hence
> > >> >> >> >> >> >worthless.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >> WRONG. I would have done him a FAVOR to remove that
tras=
h -- a
> > >> >> >> >> >> victimless crime.
>
> > >> >> >> >> >Run that one past a judge. =A0Or better yet, try it as an
=
experiment,
> > >> >> >> >> >repeating enough times to get cought. =A0My guess is that
=
we might be
> > >> >> >> >> >spared from your presense on usenet for some time.
>
> > >> >> >> >> I know that mountain bikers would LOVE for me to stop
telli=
ng the
> > >> >> >> >> truth about their selfish, destructive, disgusting s****t,
b=
ut it isn't
> > >> >> >> >> going to happen, and my postings to the newsgroups will be
=
around
> > >> >> >> >> forever, even after I'm gone, to carry on my message.
What'=
s YOUR
> > >> >> >> >> excuse for living?
>
> > >> >> >> >Non sequitur (due to having no cogent reply), plus showing
an=
arrogant
> > >> >> >> >disregard for human life.
>
> > >> >> >> I knew you couldn't answer that, because you HAVE no good
excu=
se for
> > >> >> >> living. You are a waste of good protoplasm.
>
> > >> >> >Vandeman, go f___ yourself. =A0That's the only response you
dese=
rve.
>
> > >> >> Thanks for proving my point. I couldn't have done it any better.
>
> > >> >No point of yours was proved. =A0When you call someone a "good
wast=
e
> > >> >of protoplasm", you deserve to be treated just like the low-life,
> > >> >contemptible excuse for humanity that you are.
>
> > >> Thanks for proving my point AGAIN! I couldn't have done it any
bette=
r.
>
> > >You have no "point", troll. =A0You were simply rude and were told off
> > >for inexcusable conduct.
>
> > I know: you are just a boor, and can't help it. You have amply proven
> > it. Just look up.
>
> Vandeman, you are a mindless troll.
>
> --
> My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB
Vandeman does have a mind, he is mentally ill and unstable. Its a
shame that he REFUSES to admit that he is ill and doesn't seek
professional help.
|
