On Jul 4, 2:22=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 05:35:16 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Jul 4, 1:32=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:09:57 -0700 (PDT), shragap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >On Jul 2, 11:48=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT), shragap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >On Jul 1, 8:53=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT), shragap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> >> >On Jun 30, 12:21=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrot=
e:
>
> >> >> >> >> >There you go again...Liar. I don't mountain bike. Therefore
=
you lie
> >> >> >> >> >again by saying i do.
>
> >> >> >> >> You did once, making you a mountain biker, LIAR.
>
> >> >> >> >He did once, making him a mountain biker?
>
> >> >> >> >So did you, once:
>
> >> >> >> Learn to read. He used to be a mountain biker, once. I didn't
sa=
y he
> >> >> >> mountain biked one time. DUH!
>
> >> >> >Why are you being so defensive? I just made an observation about
t=
he
> >> >> >words you wrote.
>
> >> >> >There is no reason for a rational reader to interpret the above
> >> >> >exchange as he "used to be a mountain biker, once." Those words
ar=
en=92t
> >> >> >there. These are:
>
> >> >> >maguahiker: "I don't mountain bike."
> >> >> >Dr. Vandeman: "You did once, making you a mountain biker"
>
> >> >> >In other words, you wrote, "You did [mountain bike] once, making
y=
ou a
> >> >> >mountain biker."
>
> >> >> I didn't say "one time". I said "once", i.e. in the past.
>
> >> >Nobody suggested you wrote, "one time." Let's just use the words you
> >> >actually wrote, OK?
>
> >> >> >You also mountain biked once, according to your own letter to the
=
East
> >> >> >Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors, which makes you a
> >> >> >mountain biker.
>
> >> >> No, it doesn't. I rode a mountain bike once. I was never a
mountain
> >> >> biker. If you can't understand that, it's because you don't care
to=
..
>
> >> >Don't project how you think I should feel. Try to be objective.
>
> >> >You didn't write that maguahiker was a mountain biker once. Those
> >> >words aren't there. You and he clearly referred to the act of
mountai=
n
> >> >biking, not being a mountain biker.
>
> >> >Are you now suggesting that when you rode the mountain bike on those
> >> >fire roads used by mountain bikers a few days before you weren't
> >> >mountain biking? How is that possible? Were the racers there four
day=
s
> >> >prior not mountain biking?
>
> >> >maguahiker: "I don't mountain bike."
> >> >Dr. Vandeman to maguahiker: "You did [mountain bike] once, making
you
> >> >a mountain biker."
> >> >Dr. Vandeman about himself: "I rode a mountain bike once."
>
> >> >You are a mountain biker, Dr. Vandeman.
>
> >> Do I have to teach you EVERYTHING?
>
> >No, because you are not a teacher, never have been, never will be.
>
> Yes, I have been. You obviously are (1) utterly ignorant, (2) a LIAR,
> or (3) BOTH utterly ignorant and a LIAR.
You claimed mountain biking is a crime against nature. You committed
a
crime against nature when you mountain biked. You committed the same
crime you preach against. You killed wildlife and destroyed habitat.
You are a mountain biker and you are a hypocrite.
|
