On Jul 6, 12:17=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 13:21:31 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Jul 5, 3:24=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 04:19:38 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >On Jul 4, 10:28=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:38:05 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >On Jul 4, 2:22=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 05:35:16 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Jul 4, 1:32=A0am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:09:57 -0700 (PDT),
shragap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 2, 11:48=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wr=
ote:
> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:35:51 -0700 (PDT),
shragap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jul 1, 8:53=A0pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT),
shragap...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >On Jun 30, 12:21=A0am, Mike Vandeman
<mjva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >There you go again...Liar. I don't mountain bike.
T=
herefore you lie
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >again by saying i do.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> You did once, making you a mountain biker, LIAR.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >He did once, making him a mountain biker?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> >So did you, once:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >> Learn to read. He used to be a mountain biker, once. I
=
didn't say he
> >> >> >> >> >> >> mountain biked one time. DUH!
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >Why are you being so defensive? I just made an
observatio=
n about the
> >> >> >> >> >> >words you wrote.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >There is no reason for a rational reader to interpret
the=
above
> >> >> >> >> >> >exchange as he "used to be a mountain biker, once."
Those=
words aren=92t
> >> >> >> >> >> >there. These are:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >maguahiker: "I don't mountain bike."
> >> >> >> >> >> >Dr. Vandeman: "You did once, making you a mountain
biker"
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >In other words, you wrote, "You did [mountain bike]
once,=
making you a
> >> >> >> >> >> >mountain biker."
>
> >> >> >> >> >> I didn't say "one time". I said "once", i.e. in the past.
>
> >> >> >> >> >Nobody suggested you wrote, "one time." Let's just use the
w=
ords you
> >> >> >> >> >actually wrote, OK?
>
> >> >> >> >> >> >You also mountain biked once, according to your own
lette=
r to the East
> >> >> >> >> >> >Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors, which
make=
s you a
> >> >> >> >> >> >mountain biker.
>
> >> >> >> >> >> No, it doesn't. I rode a mountain bike once. I was never
a=
mountain
> >> >> >> >> >> biker. If you can't understand that, it's because you
don'=
t care to.
>
> >> >> >> >> >Don't project how you think I should feel. Try to be
objecti=
ve.
>
> >> >> >> >> >You didn't write that maguahiker was a mountain biker once.
=
Those
> >> >> >> >> >words aren't there. You and he clearly referred to the act
o=
f mountain
> >> >> >> >> >biking, not being a mountain biker.
>
> >> >> >> >> >Are you now suggesting that when you rode the mountain bike
=
on those
> >> >> >> >> >fire roads used by mountain bikers a few days before you
wer=
en't
> >> >> >> >> >mountain biking? How is that possible? Were the racers
there=
four days
> >> >> >> >> >prior not mountain biking?
>
> >> >> >> >> >maguahiker: "I don't mountain bike."
> >> >> >> >> >Dr. Vandeman to maguahiker: "You did [mountain bike] once,
m=
aking you
> >> >> >> >> >a mountain biker."
> >> >> >> >> >Dr. Vandeman about himself: "I rode a mountain bike once."
>
> >> >> >> >> >You are a mountain biker, Dr. Vandeman.
>
> >> >> >> >> Do I have to teach you EVERYTHING?
>
> >> >> >> >No, because you are not a teacher, never have been, never will
=
be.
>
> >> >> >> Yes, I have been. You obviously are (1) utterly ignorant, (2) a
=
LIAR,
> >> >> >> or (3) BOTH utterly ignorant and a LIAR.
>
> >> >> >You claimed mountain biking is a crime against nature. You
committ=
ed
> >> >> >a
> >> >> >crime against nature when you mountain biked. You committed the
sa=
me
> >> >> >crime you preach against. You killed wildlife and destroyed
habita=
t.
> >> >> >You are a mountain biker and you are a hypocrite.
>
> >> >> You are a mountain biker complaining about someone else mountain
> >> >> biking. That's called a "hypocrite".
>
> >> >I am not a mountain biker.
>
> >> You defend mountain biking. Same thing.
>
> >Nope, try to be honest just once. You lied and said I worked for an
> >airline.
>
> You are LYING. A lie must be a conscious falsehood. Since I don't know
> exactly what you do, and relied on my memory, that is at worst an
> error, not a lie. Of course, you already knew that, and chose to LIE
> and call it a "lie".
>
> > You lied and said I was a mountain biker.
>
> That's at worst an error, not a lie.
Wrong. I aleady told you several times before that I was NOT a
mountain biker, so you knew the facts and made a conscience descision
to DELIBERATELY LIE about me. You are never going to live this down
until you admit your dishonesty.
>
> =A0You lied and said
>
> >you wrote a book on mountain biking.
>
> That's another lie. I said I "wrote the book on mountain biking
> impacts". That's an expression that means I wrote the definitive work
> on that subject. It doesn't mean I wrote a book on mountain biking.
> Learn English!
>
> > You killed wildlife
>
> That's another deliberate lie, since you don't know that, can't know
> that, and KNOW that you don't.
You claimed wildlife is killed when people mountain bike and you
mountain biked, so either you were lying when you made that claim or
you are lying now, either way it makes you a LIAR.
|
