Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Societal issues > Re: Tom Sherman...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 52 of 104 Topic 2811 of 3186
Post > Topic >>

Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?

by JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 9, 2008 at 11:33 AM

On Jul 8, 11:38 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:ed1b917b-1215-4fe3-8b2b-9fdfdbf96755@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Jul 6, 4:47 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> I never give a damn whether anyone takes my advice or not - as
long as
> >> >> one
> >> >> does not whine about it.
>
> >> > I harbor deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my
very
> >> > good advice (your own words).
>
> >> It was OK not to take my advice; it was not OK to whine about it.
>
> > BULL****!!!  You said otherwise yourself when you wrote ... I harbor
> > deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my very good
> > advice.
>
> > FACT:  This has nothing to do with whining and everything to do with
> > rejection.  Your own words stand in testimony.
>
> Rejection is my middle name. Hells Bells, I never agree with anyone
about
> anything, In fact, when anyone ever does agree with me about something,

t's all about contention with you, isn't it?

> I am
> shocked and think it is a trick to beguile and to bedevil me. Nay, all
you
> ever had to say was that you were going to do it your way despite my
very
> good advice.

In fact, I did emphatically state that I was going to do it my way
which you dismissed and pcontinued to harp (read whine) about why I
was wrong-headed and why I should heed your allegedly "good advice".

> That would have settled it just fine with me.

BUT, it didn't  settle it now did it?

> But instead, you
> whined like a spoiled brat because you recognized that I thought you
were
> making a jerk of yourself - which of course you were.

Errant assumption stated as fact.  This is a classic example of an ego
defense mechanism at work ... projection, that is accusing someone
else about whining wheh the accuser is himself the whiner.

> > OVER & OVER ... AGAIN & AGAIN, you persisted in your attempts to
> > impose ... no, make that force feed me, your advice which you also
> > firmly insisted that I abide by even though I very clearly indicated
> > that your advice was NOT requested, wanted or needed.  Had you been
> > considerate enough to respected my wishes, I would not have even had
> > to even repeat my request.  Stubborn blockhead that you are, you
> > tenaciously persisted.  Requesting that you refrain from offering
> > advice is NOT whining, however your incessant harping about why I
> > really should take and abide by your advice  ... IS, in fact, whining.
>
> Jeez, why didn't you just tell Ed Gin to go **** himself like I
suggested?
> Instead, you encouraged him and brought down the whole freaking
newsgroup
> with your imploring. What a truly disgusting spectacle. I felt the shame
you
> should have felt. For that, I can never forgive you!
> [...]

Allow me to thank you for making my point that you continue to offer
advice or at least continue to whine about why I didn't take and abide
by your advice.  When do you intend to stop.?  No one cares but you.
Get over it already.  Encouraging Ed Gin is purely your own personal
twisted misconception.  If the newsgroup had been brought down, how
then are you continuing to post in the allegedly destroyed
newsgroup ... DUH?!?!?!  If you felt shame the I should have felt, I'd
suggest that you take this issue up with your therapist.

> >> > Then you should have come to the obvious conclusion that it was
time
> >> > to depart rather than to remain and rave on like a lunatic.
>
> >> And leave the field of battle to the likes of Tom Sherman? Not a
chance.
>
> > Unlike yourself, most posters probably don't consider a newsgroup to
> > be a field of battle, at least not until an obnoxious jerk like you
> > comes along and makes it such.
>
> Why would anyone ever post to a newsgroup to agree with someone. I only
post to disagree.

I'm not sure why you have an issue with agreeing with someone else,
but thanks for formally going on record to state that you are about
contention.

> Too bad others do not know how to disagree agreeably, but that
> is what you have to learn to do when you are confronted with a Personage
so
> Great as Myself.

You haven learned to disagree agreeably, but more im****tantly, you
haven't learned to stop giving unwanted advice or how to deal with it
when your unwanted, unnecessary advice is rejected.  Get over yourself
already.

> is what you have to learn to do when you are confronted with a Personage
so
> Great as Myself.

Delusion must be comforting.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 




 104 Posts in Topic:
Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-07 21:44:40 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tomkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-07 23:39:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-08 06:50:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-08 14:50:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-09 01:49:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-13 11:09:54 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:28:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tim McNamara <timmcn@[  2008-06-28 12:59:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
The Nelson Paradigm <n  2008-06-28 17:36:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:52:02 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
A Muzi <am@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-28 13:35:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 19:43:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:56:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 05:07:03 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 07:42:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 19:53:05 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 22:00:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-16 12:22:42 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-16 14:55:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-17 10:07:23 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-17 14:53:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-18 05:36:45 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-18 10:37:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-19 10:23:26 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-19 14:14:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-20 08:16:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-20 13:51:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:45:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-21 16:07:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-21 21:45:34 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-23 12:35:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-23 16:43:41 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 12:28:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 17:11:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 17:21:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 22:42:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:03:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-02 02:49:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-06 06:32:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-06 16:47:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 16:13:04 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 18:51:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 17:42:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 23:38:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 07:43:20 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 19:49:16 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-10 00:55:38 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:43:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:04:27 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:48:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 18:55:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 11:33:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 17:55:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:27:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:00:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:18:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 21:09:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:12:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:00:18 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:22:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:14:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:27:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:04:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 16:52:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:38:00 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:01:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 01:05:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:18:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:45:57 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 10:08:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:10:35 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 18:51:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:32:41 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 19:40:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:00:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:46:05 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:11:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:56:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:47:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:00:10 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:50:37 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:06:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:44:55 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:05:06 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:47:49 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 13:57:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:26:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:19:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:31:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:31:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:43:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:29:21 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:33:05 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:52:43 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:44:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:55:41 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:29:34 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-18 17:49:26 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:33:42 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-19 22:14:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-20 10:23:47 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-23 09:42:07 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-23 12:54:53 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-24 15:26:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 14:03:15 CST 2008.