Re: Taxonomy

On Jul 12, 10:08 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:g5a90n$oqq$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> The only conclusion to be drawn is that Mike Vandeman is a genius just
like
> Ed Dolan the Great is a genius. On the other hand JimmyMac belongs to a
> universe of idiots, all of whom seem to want to post their idiotic
messages
> to Usenet. Jeez, don't they have wives they can talk to?
>
> Tom Sherman wrote:
> >> ...
> >> The only conclusion to be drawn is that Mike Vandeman is a gen[]us
just
> >> like Ed Dolan the Gr[]at[e] is a gen[]us....
>
> > Indeed, Ed and Mikey are in their own genus.
>
> As long as you don't include yourself in our genus I am satisfied. We
Great
> Ones do not belong to the common run such as yourself. I put you above
> JimmyMac, but only slightly.

Gee Tom ... I don't know how I should perceive our relative positions
in Dolan's imaginary hierarchy (read pecker, I mean pecking order) .
Truth be told, the man's opinion matters not because he matters not.
I certainly have no aspiration to ever be considered of the same
gen[]us as Ed or Mike.  I mean why would one ever aspire to attain
achieve evolutionary regression?

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota