Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Societal issues > Re: Taxonomy
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 77 of 104 Topic 2811 of 3170
Post > Topic >>

Re: Taxonomy

by JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 13, 2008 at 05:11 AM

On Jul 12, 7:40 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:1ca3c0d6-ae45-4a20-a78f-283c05308c9f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On Jul 12, 10:08 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >>news:g5a90n$oqq$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> >> The only conclusion to be drawn is that Mike Vandeman is a genius
just
> >> like
> >> Ed Dolan the Great is a genius. On the other hand JimmyMac belongs to
a
> >> universe of idiots, all of whom seem to want to post their idiotic
> >> messages
> >> to Usenet. Jeez, don't they have wives they can talk to?
>
> >> Tom Sherman wrote:
> >> >> ...
> >> >> The only conclusion to be drawn is that Mike Vandeman is a gen[]us
> >> >> just
> >> >> like Ed Dolan the Gr[]at[e] is a gen[]us....
>
> >> > Indeed, Ed and Mikey are in their own genus.
>
> >> As long as you don't include yourself in our genus I am satisfied. We
> >> Great
> >> Ones do not belong to the common run such as yourself. I put you
above
> >> JimmyMac, but only slightly.
>
> > Gee Tom ... I don't know how I should perceive our relative positions
> > in Dolan's imaginary hierarchy (read pecker, I mean pecking order) .
> > Truth be told, the man's opinion matters not because he matters not.
> > I certainly have no aspiration to ever be considered of the same
> > gen[]us as Ed or Mike.  I mean why would one ever aspire to attain
> > achieve evolutionary regression?
>
> Better watch yourself JimmyMac! Tom Sherman's middle name is treachery.
You
> would be well advised to align yourself with the Devil before you align
> yourself with him.

Still offering unrequested, unwanted, unneeded advice that will AGAIN
be rejected?

> In any event, he will fall silent when the chips are
> down. He is a coward and is a friend to Ed Gin, the criminal vandal
troll
> who destroyed ARBR - aided and abetted by you of course.

ARBR is not destroyed.  Ed Gin is past history. You are stuck in a
time-warp of the past obsessed with a man who, in his absence,
continues to exert control over you.  Have you discussed your
obssesion with your therapist?


> Tom Sherman is smarter than JimmyMac, but JimmyMac is fairer and more
open
> and honest by far. Of the two, I much prefer JimmyMac. Tom Sherman has a
> treasonous heart like all liberals and is never to be trusted. I
sometimes
> feel pity for JimmyMac, but never for Tom Sherman. He is my main enemy
here

> on ARBR, not JimmyMac.

I suspect that Tom cares about as much as I do about your opinion of
us ... that is not in the least.

> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 




 104 Posts in Topic:
Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-07 21:44:40 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tomkeats@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-06-07 23:39:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-08 06:50:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
tkeats2005@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-06-08 14:50:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-09 01:49:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-13 11:09:54 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 11:28:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tim McNamara <timmcn@[  2008-06-28 12:59:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
The Nelson Paradigm <n  2008-06-28 17:36:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:52:02 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
A Muzi <am@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-28 13:35:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0  2008-06-28 19:43:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:56:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 05:07:03 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 07:42:12 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-14 19:53:05 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-14 22:00:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-16 12:22:42 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-16 14:55:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-17 10:07:23 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-17 14:53:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-18 05:36:45 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-18 10:37:58 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-19 10:23:26 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-19 14:14:01 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-20 08:16:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-20 13:51:13 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-28 19:45:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-21 16:07:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-21 21:45:34 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-23 12:35:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-23 16:43:41 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 12:28:51 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 17:11:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-06-26 17:21:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-06-26 22:42:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-01 22:03:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-02 02:49:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-06 06:32:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-06 16:47:46 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 16:13:04 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 18:51:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-08 17:42:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-08 23:38:32 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 07:43:20 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 19:49:16 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-10 00:55:38 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:43:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:04:27 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 08:48:30 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 18:55:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 11:33:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 17:55:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 20:27:47 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:00:37 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-09 18:18:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-09 21:09:17 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:12:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:00:18 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:22:59 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:14:48 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-10 06:27:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-11 07:04:19 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 16:52:29 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:38:00 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:01:44 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 01:05:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-11 17:18:28 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 00:45:57 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 10:08:36 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:10:35 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 18:51:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-12 16:32:41 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-12 19:40:08 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:00:21 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:46:05 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-13 05:11:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-13 09:56:07 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:47:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:00:10 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-14 06:50:37 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-14 13:06:15 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:44:55 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:05:06 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 07:47:49 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-15 13:57:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 09:26:50 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:19:52 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:31:48 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-16 12:31:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-16 21:43:53 
Re: Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:29:21 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:33:05 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:52:43 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-17 11:44:51 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-17 15:55:41 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:29:34 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-18 17:49:26 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-18 15:33:42 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-19 22:14:40 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-20 10:23:47 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-23 09:42:07 
Re: Taxonomy
"Edward Dolan"   2008-07-23 12:54:53 
Re: Taxonomy
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@[  2008-07-24 15:26:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 18:34:56 CST 2008.