Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cycling > Unicycling > Re: higher SI= ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 16653 of 21864
Post > Topic >>

Re: higher SI= higher SIF?

by SkierAlex <SkierAlex@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 03:10 AM

skrobo wrote: 
> most people suck at riding SIF at first, until they get good at that
> they won't be able to hop, you are presumably better than most ppl who
> can jump 30cm (1 foot or so) at SIF, so you're better at SIF hopping.
> 
> i'm way better at SI than SIF, i can hit well over 30" SI, but
> sometimes i have trouble w/ 24-26" obstacles SIF... its all your style.
> i like SI better, maybe you like SIF better?



Well over 30" static or rolling? If it's static that's pretty high.

I can get 52cm SI and like 30 SIF. But I've hardly practised SIF at all
lol. I will now that my SI height is decent.


-- 
SkierAlex
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SkierAlex's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/16317
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/69948


 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
                http://www.usenet.com
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: higher SI= higher SIF?
SkierAlex <SkierAlex@[  2008-05-15 03:10:46 
Re: higher SI= higher SIF?
sigve <sigve@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 04:38:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 19:20:35 CST 2008.